SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2508.16022

Constructing Long Paths in Graph Streams

Abstract

In the graph stream model of computation, an algorithm processes the edges of an input graph in one or more sequential passes while using a memory sublinear in the input size. This model poses significant challenges for constructing long paths. Many known algorithms tasked with extending an existing path as a subroutine require an entire pass to add a single additional edge. This raises a fundamental question: Are multiple passes inherently necessary to construct paths of non-trivial lengths, or can a single pass suffice? To address this question, we study the Longest Path problem in the one-pass streaming model. In this problem, given a desired approximation factor $\alpha$, the objective is to compute a path of length at least $\lp(G) / \alpha$, where $\lp(G)$ is the length of a longest path in the input graph. We give algorithms as well as space lower bounds for both undirected and directed graphs. Our results include: We show that for undirected graphs, in both the insertion-only and the insertion-deletion models, there are semi-streaming algorithms, that compute a path of length at least $d /3$ with high probability, where $d$ is the average degree of the graph. These algorithms can also yield an $\alpha$-approximation to Longest Path using space $\tilde{O}(n^2 / \alpha)$. Next, we show that such a result cannot be achieved for directed graphs, even in the insertion-only model. We show that computing a $(n^{1 - o(1)})$-approximation to Longest Path in directed graphs in the insertion-only model requires space $\Omega(n^2)$. We further show two additional lower bounds. First, we show that semi-streaming space is insufficient for small constant factor approximations to Longest Path for undirected graphs in the insertion-only model. Last, in undirected graphs in the insertion-deletion model, we show that computing an $\alpha$-approximation requires space $\Omega(n^2 / \alpha^3)$.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Christian Konrad, Chhaya Trehan. 2025-08-22. Constructing Long Paths in Graph Streams. https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.16022

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS