SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2508.18798

CASP: An evaluation dataset for formal verification of C code

Abstract

Recent developments in Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown promise in automating code generation, yet the generated programs lack rigorous correctness guarantees. Formal verification can address this shortcoming, but requires expertise and is time-consuming to apply. Currently, there is no dataset of verified C code paired with formal specifications that enables systematic benchmarking in this space. To fill this gap, we present a curated evaluation dataset of C code paired with formal specifications written in ANSI/ISO C Specification Language (ACSL). We develop a multi-stage filtering process to carefully extract 506 pairs of C code and formal specifications from The Stack 1 and The Stack 2. We first identify C files annotated with formal languages. Then, we ensure that the annotated C files formally verify, and employ LLMs to improve non-verifying files. Furthermore, we post-process the remaining files into pairs of C code and ACSL specifications, where each specification-implementation pair is formally verified using Frama-C. To ensure the quality of the pairs, a manual inspection is conducted to confirm the correctness of every pair. The resulting dataset of C-ACSL specification pairs (CASP) provides a foundation for benchmarking and further research on integrating automated code generation with verified correctness.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Niclas Hertzberg, Merlijn Sevenhuijsen, Liv Kåreborn, Anna Lokrantz. 2025-08-26. CASP: An evaluation dataset for formal verification of C code. https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.18798

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Beyond the Turing threshold: Productive grammars generate essentially undecidable languages

Emil Post's productive sets are not even semi-computable, let alone computable, being thus essentially incomputable. Accordingly, formal languages whose set of words is a (completely) productive set are essentially undecidable. In this article, I elaborate on Post productivity from the viewpoint of formal language theory: I design formal grammars that emulate the construction of productive sets of natural numbers and are thus beyond Turing-decidability.

cs.FL

RAGTIMER 1.0: Rapid Rare-Event Partial State Space Construction for Stochastic VAS (extended version)

Transient reachability analysis of rare events in Continuous-Time Stochastic Vector Addition Systems (CTSVAS) such as Chemical Reaction Networks (CRNs) has proven a formidable challenge to cutting-edge tools. Underlying a CTSVAS is a continuous-time Markov chain (CTMC), and CTMC transient reachability analysis calls for Probabilistic Model Checking (PMC). This analysis requires the explicit representation of a model's entire state space. Rare events occur with extremely low probability, compounding the challenge of probabilistic analysis. In CRNs, it is imperative to verify the probability of rare events; even a low concentration of a species can have pathological consequences. This paper presents the RAGTIMER 1.0 tool, which efficiently builds a partial state space for a CTSVAS by enumerating traces to a rare event of interest and expanding them to exploit concurrency and cycles, providing a guaranteed lower bound on the probability of a rare event. Guaranteed lower bounds are particularly useful in synthetic biological applications because they indicate how and when a rare event can be experimentally observed. RAGTIMER is an attractive alternative to existing rare event analysis methods for CTSVAS models. It outperforms existing PMC tools and refutes multiple probability estimates from rare-event stochastic simulation on multiple challenging CRN models. RAGTIMER uses optimized data structures, a simple input format, and memory-safe Rust code to improve the scalability and accessibility of PMC for industry professionals.

cs.FL

Execution-Time Opacity Logic: A Logic for Ensuring ET-Opacity in Timed Systems

Ensuring confidentiality in Cyber-Physical Systems is critical, especially when attackers exploit execution times to infer sensitiveinformation. Traditional opacity models are inadequate for timed systems, as verifying opacity in Timed Automata is undecidable. To address this challenge, we propose Execution-Time Opacity Logic (ETOL), a new formalism that specifies opacity by requiring that for every execution satisfying a secret formula, there exists another execution of the same duration that does not satisfy it. ETOL guarantees that timing observations cannot reveal confidential agent activities. We present a decidable and efficient verification framework based on zone-based model checking, supported by a dedicated algorithm that systematically identifies duration-equivalent executions. Our approach is validated through an ATM case study, showing that ETOL enables efficient verification of execution-time confidentiality under timing attacks. We also developed a prototype tool for the ETOL logic that supports symbolic model checking over timed systems. It allows users to verify ETOL formulas based on clock-constrained execution paths.

cs.FL