SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2509.01861

On the role of the design phase in a linear regression

Abstract

The "design phase" refers to a stage in observational studies, during which a researcher constructs a subsample that achieves a better balance in covariate distributions between the treated and untreated units. In this paper, we study the role of this preliminary phase in the context of linear regression, offering a justification for its utility. To that end, we first formalize the design phase as a process of estimand adjustment via selecting a subsample. Then, we show that covariate balance of a subsample is indeed a justifiable criterion for guiding the selection: it informs on the maximum degree of model misspecification that can be allowed for a subsample, when a researcher wishes to restrict the bias of the estimand for the parameter of interest within a target level of precision. In this sense, the pursuit of a balanced subsample in the design phase is interpreted as identifying an estimand that is less susceptible to bias in the presence of model misspecification. Also, we demonstrate that covariate imbalance can serve as a sensitivity measure in regression analysis, and illustrate how it can structure a communication between a researcher and the readers of her report.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Junho Choi. 2025-09-02. On the role of the design phase in a linear regression. https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.01861

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Identification in Linear Quantile Panel Models

This paper studies identification in linear quantile panel models with unrestricted individual heterogeneity when the number of time periods is fixed and small. We impose strict exogeneity, whereby the conditional quantile restriction holds given the individual's complete regressor history and latent individual effect, but otherwise allow the disturbances to be arbitrarily dependent over time.

econ.EM

Experimental Design for Policy Choice

We show how to optimally design experiments when the resulting data will be used to choose a welfare-maximizing policy subject to constraints. A decision maker seeks to maximize Bayes expected welfare by choosing a policy whose effects depend on an unknown finite-dimensional parameter. The decision maker has access to a first wave of experimental data with a fixed design but may choose the design of a second wave that will be collected before choosing the policy. The resulting experimental design--policy choice problem is a very high-dimensional dynamic program that is generally intractable in finite samples. We propose a tractable approximation based on the limit experiment and show it is asymptotically optimal using a new asymptotic representation theorem for adaptive experiments with continuous treatments. We apply the method to a conditional cash transfer experiment and demonstrate the potential for large gains from tailoring the experiment to the policy choice.

econ.EM

Designing Spatial Treatments

Spatial treatments are interventions assigned to locations potentially distinct from those of the responding units. We study their optimal design under a general model in which a unit's response diminishes with distance to a treated site. Our estimand of interest is an ``uncontaminated'' effect equal to the average impact of a single intervention site over all hypothetical sites. We propose a novel design based on a Mat\'{e}rn point process which separates treatments by a distance of at least $r$. A larger choice of $r$ reduces bias by separating interventions but increases variance by reducing their numerosity. We choose $r$ to maximize the rate of convergence of a Horvitz-Thompson estimator and prove that this is minimax rate-optimal. We provide weak conditions under which the estimator is asymptotically normal and propose a variance estimator.

econ.EM