Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2509.04640

Additive, Near-Additive, and Multiplicative Approximations for APSP in Weighted Undirected Graphs: Trade-offs and Algorithms

Liam Roditty·Ariel Sapir
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We present a $+2\sum_{i=1}^{k+1}{W_i}$-APASP algorithm for dense weighted graphs with runtime $\tilde O\left(n^{2+\frac{1}{3k+2}}\right)$, where $W_{i}$ is the weight of an $i^{th}$ heaviest edge on a shortest path. Dor, Halperin and Zwick [FOCS'96, SICOMP'00] had two algorithms for the commensurate unweighted $+2\cdot\left( k+1\right)$-APASP: $\tilde O\left(n^{2-\frac{1}{k+2}}m^{\frac{1}{k+2}}\right)$ runtime for sparse graphs and $\tilde O\left(n^{2+\frac{1}{3k+2}}\right)$ runtime for dense graphs. Cohen and Zwick [SODA'97, JALG'01] adapted the sparse variant to weighted graphs: $+2\sum_{i=1}^{k+1}{W_i}$-APASP algorithm in the same runtime. We show an algorithm for dense weighted graphs. For nearly additive APASP, we present a $\left(1+\varepsilon,\min{\left\{2W_1,4W_{2}\right\}}\right)$-APASP algorithm with $\tilde O\left(\left(\frac{1}{\varepsilon}\right)^{O\left(1\right)}\cdot n^{2.15135313}\cdot\log W\right)$ runtime. This improves the $\left(1+\varepsilon,2W_1\right)$-APASP of Saha and Ye [SODA'24]. For multiplicative APASP, we show a framework of $\left(\frac{3\ell +4}{\ell + 2}+\varepsilon\right)$-APASP algorithms, reducing the runtime of Akav and Roditty [ESA'21] for dense graphs and generalizing the $\left(2+\varepsilon\right)$-APASP algorithm of Dory et al [SODA'24]. Our base case is a $\left(\frac{7}{3}+\varepsilon\right)$-APASP in $\tilde O\left(\left(\frac{1}{\varepsilon}\right)^{O\left(1\right)}\cdot n^{2.15135313}\cdot \log W\right)$ runtime, improving the $\frac{7}{3}$-APASP algorithm of Baswana and Kavitha [FOCS'06, SICOMP'10] for dense graphs. Finally, we "bypass" an $\tilde \Omega \left(n^\omega\right)$ conditional lower bound by Dor, Halperin, and Zwick for $\alpha$-APASP with $\alpha < 2$, by allowing an additive term (e.g. $\left(\frac{6k+3}{3k+2},\sum_{i=1}^{k+1}W_{i}\right)$-APASP in $\tilde O\left(n^{2+\frac{1}{3k+2}}\right)$ runtime).

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Liam Roditty, Ariel Sapir. 2025-09-04. Additive, Near-Additive, and Multiplicative Approximations for APSP in Weighted Undirected Graphs: Trade-offs and Algorithms. https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.04640

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗