SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2509.07599

Tight Bounds for Low-Error Frequency Moment Estimation and the Power of Multiple Passes

Abstract

Estimating the second frequency moment $F_2$ of a data stream up to a $(1 \pm \varepsilon)$ factor is a central problem in the streaming literature. For errors $\varepsilon > \Omega(1/\sqrt{n})$, the tight bound $\Theta\left(\log(\varepsilon^2 n)/\varepsilon^2\right)$ was recently established by Braverman and Zamir. In this work, we complete the picture by resolving the remaining regime of small error, $\varepsilon < 1/\sqrt{n}$, showing that the optimal space complexity is $\Theta\left( \min\left(n, \frac{1}{\varepsilon^2} \right) \cdot \left(1 + \left| \log(\varepsilon^2 n) \right| \right) \right)$ bits for all $\varepsilon \geq 1/n^2$, assuming a sufficiently large universe. This closes the gap between the best known $\Omega(n)$ lower bound and the straightforward $O(n \log n)$ upper bound in that range, and shows that essentially storing the entire stream is necessary for high-precision estimation. To derive this bound, we fully characterize the two-party communication complexity of estimating the size of a set intersection up to an arbitrary additive error $\varepsilon n$. In particular, we prove a tight $\Omega(n \log n)$ lower bound for one-way communication protocols when $\varepsilon < n^{-1/2-\Omega(1)}$, in contrast to classical $O(n)$-bit protocols that use two-way communication. Motivated by this separation, we present a two-pass streaming algorithm that computes the exact histogram of a stream with high probability using only $O(n \log \log n)$ bits of space, in contrast to the $\Theta(n \log n)$ bits required in one pass even to approximate $F_2$ with small error. This yields the first asymptotic separation between one-pass and $O(1)$-passes space complexity for small frequency moment estimation.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Naomi Green-Maimon, Or Zamir. 2025-09-09. Tight Bounds for Low-Error Frequency Moment Estimation and the Power of Multiple Passes. https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.07599

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS