Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2509.07718

Hedging Options on Asset Portfolios against Just One Underlying Asset in the Presence of Transaction Costs

Erina Nanyonga·Matt Davison
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Options are contingent claims regarding the value of underlying assets. The Black-Scholes formula provides a road map for pricing these options in a risk-neutral setting, justified by a delta hedging argument in which countervailing positions of appropriate size are taken in the underlying asset. However, what if an underlying asset is expensive to trade? It might be better to hedge with a different, but related asset that is cheaper to trade. This study considers this question in a setting in which the option written on a portfolio containing $\alpha$ shares of one asset $S_{t_1}$ and $(1-\alpha)$ shares of another security $S_{t_2}$ correlated with $S_{t_1}$. We suppose that the asset is hedged against only one of $S_{t_1}$ or $S_{t_2}.$ In the case of $\alpha=0~\text{or}~1$ we can consider this model to cover the case where an option on one asset is hedged against either the ``right" (underlying) asset or the``wrong" (related, different) asset. We hedge our portfolio on simulated data using varying trading intervals, correlation coefficients, $\rho$ and transaction costs. We calculated the risk-adjusted values ($RAV$) as the risk and return measures to make meaningful decisions on when to trade $S_{t_1}$ or $S_{t_2}.$ From the conclusions made based on $RAV,$ the size of the market price of risk and that of transaction costs on both assets are key to making a decision while hedging. From our results, trading the wrong asset can be opted for when $\rho$ is very high for reasonably small transaction costs for either of the assets.

Explore related subjects

q-fin.MF

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Erina Nanyonga, Matt Davison. 2025-09-09. Hedging Options on Asset Portfolios against Just One Underlying Asset in the Presence of Transaction Costs. https://doi.org/10.1080/27684830.2026.2677424

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Variance-Optimal Hedging in the Rough Hawkes--Heston Model

We study variance-optimal stock hedging and the convergence of approximate strategies in the rough Hawkes--Heston model. Starting from the model's affine conditional transform and the affine Volterra jump framework, we obtain semi-explicit hedges for European calls and a representation of the minimum quadratic error through the Galtchouk--Kunita--Watanabe projection. Our main approximation result keeps the original stock, variance driver, and information flow fixed while regularizing the kernel used to evaluate the hedge. To handle singular memory and common marked jumps, we construct the approximate holdings from histories available before trading and preserve the conditional transform's random modulus envelope. Riccati--Volterra stability and weighted truncation then yield convergence in the original stock's trading norm on compact Fourier intervals. For calls, a joint choice of kernel regularization and Fourier cutoff gives convergence of the initial capitals and strategies, uniform-in-time square-mean convergence of continuous-time gains, and convergence of the terminal mean-square error to the variance-optimal value. A numerical experiment with shifted fractional kernels illustrates the construction on common original-market paths.

q-fin.MF↗
arXiv2026

Numeraire Invariance of Entropy-Projected Martingale Measures

Let \(P\) be a fixed physical law and let \(Q\) be an equivalent martingale measure selected from the martingale-measure set associated with a chosen numeraire. A change of numeraire maps \(Q\) to \(T_LQ\), where \(d(T_LQ)=L\,dQ\) and \(L\) is the terminal likelihood ratio. The forward relative-entropy projection minimizing \(D_{\mathrm{KL}}(P\Vert Q)\) commutes with this transform because its objective changes only by the constant \(-E_P\log L\). The minimal entropy martingale measure (MEMM) orientation \(D_{\mathrm{KL}}(Q\Vert P)\) does not have this property, and a trinomial counterexample shows that independently recomputed MEMMs need not be likelihood compatible. We make two economic consequences explicit. First, the two entropy orientations are precisely the \(Q\)-dependent terms in the classical convex-dual objectives for logarithmic and exponential utility, respectively. Second, likelihood compatibility is equivalent to equality of the pricing functionals obtained in the two numeraires. Hence the forward selectors value every integrable claim consistently across numeraires, whereas the two MEMMs in the counterexample assign different prices to a nonreplicable digital claim. We also prove a finite-state class-level characterization: uniform invariance over the elementary one-period likelihood-ratio families forces a smooth convex \(f\)-divergence to be logarithmic, up to scaling and affine equivalence. Finally, in finite-state markets, the forward projection exists under the usual strictly positive feasible-point condition; its density \(dP/dQ^*\) is attainable log-optimal terminal wealth, and the minimum forward entropy equals maximal expected log growth.

q-fin.MF↗
arXiv2026

The Delta of a Variance Swap

We define the variance swap delta as the sensitivity of the price of variance to a change in underlying price. We use Carr-Madan spanning formulas to analyze this sensitivity when the implied volatility smile curve may depend on the underlying price. We show that the variance swap total delta is zero for the class of smile curves that are pure functions of (log) moneyness, which goes against the empirical observation that variance is up when the market is down. We propose a simple modification of the smile to correct this issue.

q-fin.MF↗