SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2509.11547

Task Decoding based on Eye Movements using Synthetic Data Augmentation

Abstract

Machine learning has been extensively used in various applications related to eye-tracking research. Understanding eye movement is one of the most significant subsets of eye-tracking research that reveals the scanning pattern of an individual. Researchers have thoroughly analyzed eye movement data to understand various eye-tracking applications, such as attention mechanisms, navigational behavior, task understanding, etc. The outcome of traditional machine learning algorithms used for decoding tasks based on eye movement data has received a mixed reaction to Yarbus' claim that it is possible to decode the observer's task from their eye movements. In this paper, to support the hypothesis by Yarbus, we are decoding tasks categories while generating synthetic data samples using well-known Synthetic Data Generators CTGAN and its variations such as CopulaGAN and Gretel AI Synthetic Data generators on available data from an in-person user study. Our results show that augmenting more eye movement data combined with additional synthetically generated improves classification accuracy even with traditional machine learning algorithms. We see a significant improvement in task decoding accuracy from 28.1% using Random Forest to 82% using Inception Time when five times more data is added in addition to the 320 real eye movement dataset sample. Our proposed framework outperforms all the available studies on this dataset because of the use of additional synthetic datasets. We validated our claim with various algorithms and combinations of real and synthetic data to show how decoding accuracy increases with the increase in the augmentation of generated data to real data.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Shanmuka Sadhu, Arca Baran, Preeti Pandey, Ayush Kumar. 2025-09-15. Task Decoding based on Eye Movements using Synthetic Data Augmentation. https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.11547

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Decoupling Readiness from Release for Tail-Aware Scheduling of Agentic LLM Workflows

Agentic LLM workflows consist of sequences of model turns interleaved with tool interactions, so their end-to-end completion time depends not only on inference speed but also on when ready turns are released. Most runtimes release each turn immediately upon readiness. Under contention, this eager release policy can accumulate released but unfinished work; once submitted, those turns can no longer be reordered by the workflow-level policy, increasing tail latency. We present a tail-risk-aware turn release scheduling method that jointly decides which ready turn to release next and how much released but unfinished work to maintain. The method uses a mean--Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR) objective to capture the evolving tail risk of unfinished workflows, incorporates online estimates of turn work when prioritizing ready turns, and adapts the released work budget to observed queue pressure. We evaluate the method using real agent execution traces from software engineering tasks across multiple LLMs and workflow arrival rates. The method performs comparably to eager release under light load and substantially reduces the P95 of workflow flow time under contention, achieving up to a \(3.50\times\) speedup.

cs.AI

Demystifying the Privacy-Utility Trade-off in LLM Interactions

The integration of Large Language Models into daily tasks relies on context-rich instructions, inevitably exposing sensitive user information. Current privacy-preserving methods typically employ context-agnostic static rules, causing severe utility degradation. However, the specific mechanisms governing how sanitization impacts downstream performance remain largely underexplored. To address this, we conduct a systematic analysis to deconstruct the privacy-utility trade-off, uncovering three underlying mechanisms: (1) Context-Dependent Utility, which first establishes when to sanitize by revealing that data value shifts from critical constraints to dispensable noise based on user intent; (2) Strategic Adaptation, which subsequently determines how to sanitize by dictating that the choice between removal and replacement depends on the task's reliance on factual integrity versus structural coherence; and (3) Combinatorial Interplay, which finally extends the protection scope by demonstrating that attributes form a semantic web of synergistic dependencies or antagonistic redundancies. Guided by these insights, we introduce an intent-driven local protection framework. By distilling a lightweight model Veilmind-4B to drive a dynamic extraction-sanitization-restoration pipeline, our approach reaches a low-leakage privacy point while preserving substantially higher response utility than existing privacy-oriented baselines, advancing the privacy-utility trade-off toward the Pareto frontier.

cs.AI

Defining AI Agents: A Compendium of Criteria, Metrics, and Benchmarks

The term agent in artificial intelligence lacks a standard definition, complicating the evaluation, comparison, and reproducibility of AI agent research. We address this ambiguity through a survey organized around five dimensions of agenticness: environmental interaction, learning and adaptation, autonomy, goal-directed behavior, and temporal coherence. For each dimension, we examine how the underlying capability has been conceptualized across prior work and synthesize the metrics, benchmarks, and evaluation frameworks used to assess it. This review provides a structured account of the current landscape of agent evaluation, highlighting both established approaches and areas where evaluation remains limited or inconsistent. We additionally introduce the Agent Compendium, a public-facing digital resource that organizes and extends the evaluation methods identified through this review. Together, the survey and compendium provide a common structure for evaluating and comparing agent capabilities across AI systems, supporting more reproducible research, clearer communication, and more systematic study of artificial agents.

cs.AI