SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2509.12347

Graph Coloring Below Guarantees via Co-Triangle Packing

Abstract

In the $\ell$-Coloring Problem, we are given a graph on $n$ nodes, and tasked with determining if its vertices can be properly colored using $\ell$ colors. In this paper we study below-guarantee graph coloring, which tests whether an $n$-vertex graph can be properly colored using $g-k$ colors, where $g$ is a trivial upper bound such as $n$. We introduce an algorithmic framework that builds on a packing of co-triangles $\overline{K_3}$ (independent sets of three vertices): the algorithm greedily finds co-triangles and employs a win-win analysis. If many are found, we immediately return YES; otherwise these co-triangles form a small co-triangle modulator, whose deletion makes the graph co-triangle-free. Extending the work of [Gutin et al., SIDMA 2021], who solved $\ell$-Coloring (for any $\ell$) in randomized $O^*(2^{k})$ time when given a $\overline{K_2}$-free modulator of size $k$, we show that this problem can likewise be solved in randomized $O^*(2^{k})$ time when given a $\overline{K_3}$-free modulator of size~$k$. This result in turn yields a randomized $O^{*}(2^{3k/2})$ algorithm for $(n-k)$-Coloring (also known as Dual Coloring), improving the previous $O^{*}(4^{k})$ bound. We then introduce a smaller parameterization, $(\omega+\overline{\mu}-k)$-Coloring, where $\omega$ is the clique number and $\overline{\mu}$ is the size of a maximum matching in the complement graph; since $\omega+\overline{\mu}\le n$ for any graph, this problem is strictly harder. Using the same co-triangle-packing argument, we obtain a randomized $O^{*}(2^{6k})$ algorithm, establishing its fixed-parameter tractability for a smaller parameter. Complementing this finding, we show that no fixed-parameter tractable algorithm exists for $(\omega-k)$-Coloring or $(\overline{\mu}-k)$-Coloring under standard complexity assumptions.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Shyan Akmal, Tomohiro Koana. 2025-09-15. Graph Coloring Below Guarantees via Co-Triangle Packing. https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.12347

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS