arXiv · 2509.13344
Benchmarking Dimensionality Reduction Techniques for Spatial Transcriptomics
Abstract
We introduce a unified framework for evaluating dimensionality reduction techniques in spatial transcriptomics beyond standard PCA approaches. We benchmark six methods PCA, NMF, autoencoder, VAE, and two hybrid embeddings on a cholangiocarcinoma Xenium dataset, systematically varying latent dimensions ($k$=5-40) and clustering resolutions ($\rho$=0.1-1.2). Each configuration is evaluated using complementary metrics including reconstruction error, explained variance, cluster cohesion, and two novel biologically-motivated measures: Cluster Marker Coherence (CMC) and Marker Exclusion Rate (MER). Our results demonstrate distinct performance profiles: PCA provides a fast baseline, NMF maximizes marker enrichment, VAE balances reconstruction and interpretability, while autoencoders occupy a middle ground. We provide systematic hyperparameter selection using Pareto optimal analysis and demonstrate how MER-guided reassignment improves biological fidelity across all methods, with CMC scores improving by up to 12\% on average. This framework enables principled selection of dimensionality reduction methods tailored to specific spatial transcriptomics analyses.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Md Ishtyaq Mahmud, Veena Kochat, Suresh Satpati, Jagan Mohan Reddy Dwarampudi, Kunal Rai, Tania Banerjee. 2025-09-12. Benchmarking Dimensionality Reduction Techniques for Spatial Transcriptomics. https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.13344
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.