Hardness of Dynamic Core and Truss Decompositions

Yan S. Couto; Cristina G. Fernandes

doi:10.1007/978-3-032-06706-7_5

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2509.13584

Hardness of Dynamic Core and Truss Decompositions

Yan S. Couto·Cristina G. Fernandes

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The k-core of a graph is its maximal subgraph with minimum degree at least k, and the core value of a vertex u is the largest k for which u is contained in the k-core of the graph. Among cohesive subgraphs, k-core and its variants have received a lot of attention recently, particularly on dynamic graphs, as reported by Hanauer, Henzinger, and Schulz in their recent survey on dynamic graph algorithms. We answer questions on k-core stated in the survey, proving that there is no efficient dynamic algorithm for k-core or to find (2 - {\epsilon})-approximations for the core values, unless we can improve decade-long state-of-the-art algorithms in many areas including matrix multiplication and satisfiability, based on the established OMv and SETH conjectures. Some of our results show that there is no dynamic algorithm for k-core asymptotically faster than the trivial ones. This explains why most recent research papers in this area focus not on a generic efficient dynamic algorithm, but on finding a bounded algorithm, which is fast when few core values change per update. However, we also prove that such bounded algorithms do not exist, based on the OMv conjecture. We present lower bounds also for a directed version of the problem, and for the edge variant of the problem, known as k-truss. On the positive side, we present a polylogarithmic dynamic algorithm for 2-core.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS cs.CC

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Yan S. Couto, Cristina G. Fernandes. 2025-09-16. Hardness of Dynamic Core and Truss Decompositions. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-06706-7_5

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

A deterministic $(1+\varepsilon)^n$ approximation for the permanent of a nonnegative matrix

For every fixed $0<\varepsilon\le1$, we give a deterministic strongly polynomial algorithm that, given a nonnegative matrix $A\in\mathbb{R}_{\ge0}^{n\times n}$, returns $Q$ satisfying $\operatorname{per} A\le Q\le(1+\varepsilon)^n\operatorname{per} A$.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗