SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2509.15401

Inference on the Distribution of Individual Treatment Effects in Nonseparable Triangular Models

Abstract

In this paper, we develop inference methods for the distribution of heterogeneous individual treatment effects (ITEs) in the nonseparable triangular model with a binary endogenous treatment and a binary instrument of Vuong and Xu (2017) and Feng, Vuong, and Xu (2019). We focus on the estimation of the cumulative distribution function (CDF) of the ITE, which can be used to address a wide range of practically important questions such as inference on the proportion of individuals with positive ITEs, the quantiles of the distribution of ITEs, and the interquartile range as a measure of the spread of the ITEs, as well as comparison of the ITE distributions across sub-populations. Moreover, our CDF-based approach can deliver more precise results than density-based approach previously considered in the literature. We establish weak convergence to tight Gaussian processes for the empirical CDF and quantile function computed from nonparametric ITE estimates of Feng, Vuong, and Xu (2019). Using those results, we develop bootstrap-based nonparametric inferential methods, including uniform confidence bands for the CDF and quantile function of the ITE distribution.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Jun Ma, Vadim Marmer, Zhengfei Yu. 2025-09-18. Inference on the Distribution of Individual Treatment Effects in Nonseparable Triangular Models. https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.15401

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Identification in Linear Quantile Panel Models

This paper studies identification in linear quantile panel models with unrestricted individual heterogeneity when the number of time periods is fixed and small. We impose strict exogeneity, whereby the conditional quantile restriction holds given the individual's complete regressor history and latent individual effect, but otherwise allow the disturbances to be arbitrarily dependent over time.

econ.EM

Experimental Design for Policy Choice

We show how to optimally design experiments when the resulting data will be used to choose a welfare-maximizing policy subject to constraints. A decision maker seeks to maximize Bayes expected welfare by choosing a policy whose effects depend on an unknown finite-dimensional parameter. The decision maker has access to a first wave of experimental data with a fixed design but may choose the design of a second wave that will be collected before choosing the policy. The resulting experimental design--policy choice problem is a very high-dimensional dynamic program that is generally intractable in finite samples. We propose a tractable approximation based on the limit experiment and show it is asymptotically optimal using a new asymptotic representation theorem for adaptive experiments with continuous treatments. We apply the method to a conditional cash transfer experiment and demonstrate the potential for large gains from tailoring the experiment to the policy choice.

econ.EM

Designing Spatial Treatments

Spatial treatments are interventions assigned to locations potentially distinct from those of the responding units. We study their optimal design under a general model in which a unit's response diminishes with distance to a treated site. Our estimand of interest is an ``uncontaminated'' effect equal to the average impact of a single intervention site over all hypothetical sites. We propose a novel design based on a Mat\'{e}rn point process which separates treatments by a distance of at least $r$. A larger choice of $r$ reduces bias by separating interventions but increases variance by reducing their numerosity. We choose $r$ to maximize the rate of convergence of a Horvitz-Thompson estimator and prove that this is minimax rate-optimal. We provide weak conditions under which the estimator is asymptotically normal and propose a variance estimator.

econ.EM