Institutional Research Computing Capabilities in Australia: 2024

Slava Kitaeff; Luc Betbeder-Matibet; Jake Carroll; Stephen Giugni; David Abramson; John Zaitseff; Sarah Walters; David Powell; Chris Bording; Trung Nguyen; Angus Macoustra; Fabien Voisin; Bowen Chen; Jarrod Hurley

arXiv · 2509.17351

Institutional Research Computing Capabilities in Australia: 2024

Slava Kitaeff·Luc Betbeder-Matibet·Jake Carroll·Stephen Giugni·David Abramson·John Zaitseff·Sarah Walters·David Powell·Chris Bording·Trung Nguyen·Angus Macoustra·Fabien Voisin·Bowen Chen·Jarrod Hurley

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Institutional research computing infrastructure plays a vital role in Australia's research ecosystem, complementing and extending national facilities. This paper analyses research computing capabilities across Australian universities and organisations, showing how institutional systems support research excellence through local compute resources, specialised hardware, and cluster solutions. Our study finds that nearly 112,258 CPU cores and 2,241 GPUs serve over 6,000 researchers as essential bridges between desktops and national facilities, enabling workflows from development to large-scale computations. The estimated replacement value of this infrastructure is $144M AUD. Drawing on detailed data from multiple institutions, we identify key patterns in deployment, utilisation, and strategic alignment with research priorities. Institutional resources provide critical support for data-intensive projects, facilitate training and higher-degree student research, enable prototyping and development, and ensure data sovereignty compliance when required. The analysis shows how these facilities leverage national investments while addressing institution-specific needs that national systems cannot meet. We present evidence that strategic investment in institutional capabilities yields significant returns through greater research productivity, enhanced graduate training, and improved outcomes. The study offers insights for organisations planning computing strategies and highlights the importance of maintaining robust institutional resources alongside national facilities.

Explore related subjects

cs.DC

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Slava Kitaeff, Luc Betbeder-Matibet, Jake Carroll, Stephen Giugni, David Abramson, John Zaitseff, Sarah Walters, David Powell, Chris Bording, Trung Nguyen, Angus Macoustra, Fabien Voisin, Bowen Chen, Jarrod Hurley. 2025-09-22. Institutional Research Computing Capabilities in Australia: 2024. https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.17351

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Online Treasure Hunt in Vertex-Permuted Dynamic Rings

We study the problem of treasure hunt by a group of $k \geq 1$ agents in vertex-permuted dynamic rings (VP). In this model, the $n$ vertices remain on a ring but are permuted at each time step. We first show that treasure hunt is impossible for any $k \leq n-3$ agents, if there are no restrictions on the sequence of permutations used in the dynamic ring. We then study the $VP(\delta)$ setting, in which for every pair $i, j$ of vertices, the edge $(i, j)$ is guaranteed to appear within $\delta$ steps. We show that the class $VP(\delta)$ is feasible only for $\delta \geq \left\lceil \frac{n-1}{2}\right\rceil$. For the one-agent case, we show a tight bound of $\Theta(\delta n)$ on the worst-case search time as well as competitive ratio of any online algorithm for treasure hunt, provided $\delta \geq 2n$. We then give an optimal algorithm for $k$ agents, thereby showing that $k$ agents can obtain a speedup of $k$ on the worst-case search time. Finally, in the R-VP setting, in which in every step, the vertices are arranged as a ring according to a random permutation, we show that treasure hunt takes expected $\Theta(n)$ steps against an oblivious adversary and $\Theta(n \log n)$ steps against an adaptive adversary.

cs.DC↗

arXiv2026

The Computing Channel: How Modulation Programs the Airwaves

Distributed computing and distributed artificial intelligence require frequent exchanges of intermediate results, although many applications need only an aggregate rather than messages from individual devices. Conventional systems recover each message before computing the aggregate, whereas over-the-air computation (OAC) exploits simultaneous transmission to obtain it directly. However, dominant OAC implementations rely on analog signaling, creating a mismatch with finite-precision data and digital communication procedures. This article presents digital function-oriented communication, in which finite-alphabet symbol representations and receiver decisions are jointly designed so that multiple-access superposition encodes the desired function without recovering individual inputs. We introduce its computational-constellation principle, main design approaches, extensions, and implementation challenges. Federated edge learning illustrates how the framework can reduce user-dependent data-bearing resources while operating directly on quantized model updates.

cs.DC↗

arXiv2026

Can AI Remediate Backend Failures Safely? GuardedAct with Blast-Radius-Aware Sandboxing

Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown promising capabilities in generating remediation actions for microservice failures. However, directly executing AI-generated repair actions in production risks cascading collateral damage. We propose GuardedAct, a sandbox-first remediation framework that interposes a blast-radius-aware verification layer between the LLM action generator and the production environment. GuardedAct operates in four phases: (1) ingesting a diagnosis report together with the live system topology and recent telemetry, (2) prompting an LLM to produce a ranked list of candidate remediation actions, (3) simulating each action in a lightweight digital-twin sandbox that estimates the blast radius and assigns a risk label, and (4) enforcing a rollback-confidence gate that auto-executes only low-risk actions while escalating high-risk ones for human review. We evaluate GuardedAct on five fault scenarios injected into the DeathStarBench social-network application. Experimental results show that GuardedAct achieves an overall recovery rate of 87.4% while reducing collateral damage by 79.7% relative to direct LLM execution (from 25.6% to 5.2%), at the cost of a modest sandbox-induced increase in mean time to recovery (approximately 8 s). Ablation studies confirm that each component contributes meaningfully to the safety-speed trade-off.

cs.DC↗