SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2509.19528

A Note on Fine-Grained Quantum Reductions for Linear Algebraic Problems

Abstract

We observe that any $T(n)$ time algorithm (quantum or classical) for several central linear algebraic problems, such as computing $\det(A)$, $tr(A^3)$, or $tr(A^{-1})$ for an $n \times n$ integer matrix $A$, yields a $O(T(n)) + \tilde O(n^2)$ time \textit{quantum algorithm} for $n \times n$ matrix-matrix multiplication. That is, on quantum computers, the complexity of these problems is essentially equivalent to that of matrix multiplication. Our results follow by first observing that the Bernstein-Vazirani algorithm gives a direct quantum reduction from matrix multiplication to computing $tr(ABC)$ for $n \times n$ inputs $A,B,C$. We can then reduce $tr(ABC)$ to each of our problems of interest. For the above problems, and many others in linear algebra, their fastest known algorithms require $\Theta(n^\omega)$ time, where $\omega \approx 2.37$ is the current exponent of fast matrix multiplication. Our finding shows that any improvements beyond this barrier would lead to faster quantum algorithms for matrix multiplication. Our results complement existing reductions from matrix multiplication in algebraic circuits [BCS13], and reductions that work for standard classical algorithms, but are not tight -- i.e., which roughly show that an $O(n^{3-\delta})$ time algorithm for the problem yields an $O(n^{3-\delta/3})$ matrix multiplication algorithm [WW10].

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Kyle Doney, Cameron Musco. 2025-09-23. A Note on Fine-Grained Quantum Reductions for Linear Algebraic Problems. https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.19528

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS