SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2509.20266

Effective bases and notions of effective second countability in computable analysis

Abstract

We investigate different notions of "computable topological base" for represented spaces. We show that several non-equivalent notions of bases become equivalent when we consider computably enumerable bases. This indicates the existence of a robust notion of computably second countable represented space. These spaces are precisely those introduced by Grubba and Weihrauch under the name "computable topological spaces". The present work thus clarifies the articulation between Schr\"oder's approach to computable topology based on the Sierpinski representation and other approaches based on notions of computable bases. These other approaches turn out to be compatible with the Sierpinski representation approach, but also strictly less general. We revisit Schr\"oder's Effective Metrization Theorem, by showing that it characterizes those represented spaces that embed into computable metric spaces: those are the computably second countable strongly computably regular represented spaces. Finally, we study different forms of open choice problems. We show that having a computable open choice is equivalent to being computably separable, but that the "non-total open choice problem", i.e., open choice restricted to open sets that have non-empty complement, interacts with effective second countability in a satisfying way.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Vasco Brattka, Emmanuel Rauzy. 2025-09-24. Effective bases and notions of effective second countability in computable analysis. https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.20266

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

There is no maximal $K$-degree

The Kolmogorov complexity of a string characterize how complex it is to describe the string. If every prefix of a real $x$ is more complex to describe than every prefix (of the same length) of real $y$, then it is seen as $x$ is more complex to describe than $y$. It is wondered if there is a real $x$ so that no other reals are strictly more complex (to describe) than $x$. The behavior of Kolmogorov complexity functions generated by reals (namely $n\mapsto$ the minimal description length of the real) is quite chaos. Therefore, it is widely believed that there are many reals that are maximally complex to describe. For instance, it is conjectured that all random enough reals have maximal $K$-degree. In this paper, it is shown that there is no real with maximal $K$-degree. Actually, for almost all real $x$, we can uniformly computably find another real whose $K$-degree is strictly above $x$.

math.LO

Quadruples and cubes

We prove, in $\mathsf{ZFC}$, that the $\lambda$-terraced cube relation fails whenever $\lambda$ is an uncountable cardinal. The corresponding terraced relation for quadruples fails for every $\lambda$. If $\lambda$ is $\aleph_0$ then the pretinent terraced relation has consistency strength of at least one Woodin cardinal. We prove positive polarized relations at a successor and a double successor from wondrous ideals. We show, however, that there are no such ideals over two consecutive cardinals simultaneously.

math.LO

Possibilistic Logic over a Logic of Formal Inconsistency

In this article, we have introduced a new possibilistic logic on a logic of formal inconsistency with the aim of developing a possibility theoretic framework to deal with uncertainty and inconsistency meaningfully without leading to a system collapse. We have discussed the syntax and semantics for this logic and have proved the soundness and completeness theorems. A set of new measures of consistency, contradictoriness, and triviality of a set of formulas have been defined. These have then been put to use in an example to show that this framework can provide better means of machine reasoning.

math.LO