SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2509.20821

Strictly zero-dimensional biframes and Raney extensions

Abstract

Raney extensions and strictly zero-dimensional biframes both faithfully extend the dual of the category of $T_0$ spaces. We use tools from pointfree topology to look at the connection between the two. Raney extensions may be equivalently described as pairs $(L,\mathcal{F})$ where $L$ is a frame and $\mathcal{F}\subseteq \mathcal{S}_{o}(L)$ a subcolocale containing all open sublocales. Here, $\mathcal{S}_o(L)$ is the collection of all intersections of open sublocales of $L$. Similarly, a strictly zero-dimensional biframe is a pair $(L,\mathcal{D})$ where $\mathcal{D}\subseteq \mathcal{S}(L)$ is a codense subcolocale. We show that there is an adjunction between certain subcolocales of $\mathcal{S}_o(L)$ and codense subcolocales of $\mathcal{S}(L)$. We show that the adjunction maximally restricts to an order-isomorphism between the subcolocales of $\mathcal{S}_o(L)$ where the joins of open sublocales distribute over binary meets, which we call the proper subcolocales, and what we call the essential codense subcolocales. As an application of our main result, we establish a bijection between proper Raney extensions and the strictly zero-dimensional biframes $(L_1,L_2,L)$ such that $L$ is an essential extension of $L_2$ in the category of frames. We show that this correspondence cannot be made functorial in the obvious way, as a frame morphism $f:L\to M$ may lift to a map $f:(L,\mathcal{F})\to (L,\mathcal{G})$ of Raney extensions without lifting to a map between the associated strictly zero-dimensional biframes.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Anna Laura Suarez. 2025-09-25. Strictly zero-dimensional biframes and Raney extensions. https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.20821

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Maximal Center of Distances of Finite Ultrametric Spaces and Perfect Binary Trees

We investigate the finite ultrametric spaces $(X,d)$ that have a given cardinality of the center of distances and a minimal cardinality of the set $X$. It is shown that such spaces are isometric if and only if their centers of distances are the same. The representing trees of these spaces are characterized up to isomorphism.

math.GN

A continuous $3$-distributive frame that is not $\omega$-distributive

We give a negative answer to the question, posed by Ern\'e, whether every $3$-distributive lattice is $\omega$-distributive. More precisely, we exhibit a continuous frame that is $\kappa$-distributive for every integer $\kappa\geq 2$, but is not a wide coframe. The frame is the open-set lattice of a compact, locally compact, countably based $T_0$ topological meet-semilattice, obtained from Lawson's construction in the logarithmic form described by Goubault-Larrecq. The failure of $\omega$-distributivity is witnessed by an explicit matrix with countably many nonempty finite rows: all row joins are the same nonzero element, whereas every choice of one entry from each row has meet zero. The same space answers negatively Ern\'e's accompanying question whether every $4$-web space is a wide web space. All properties of the construction needed for these conclusions are proved directly.

math.GN

An overlooked weakening of perfect normality: Perfect regularity in spaces and locales

We introduce the notion of perfect regularity as an appropriate weakening of perfect normality, both for spaces and locales. Various characterizations are given, using Dedekind-MacNeille completions, injective hulls, and sublocales. We place the new class of perfectly regular frames among various well-studied classes of frames. We also introduce the construction of perfect regularization of a completely regular frame, compare it to Isbell's well-known booleanization construction, and argue that it is at least as important as the latter.

math.GN