SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2509.21729

New Parallel and Streaming Algorithms for Directed Densest Subgraph

Abstract

Finding dense subgraphs is a fundamental problem with applications to community detection, clustering, and data mining. Our work focuses on finding approximate densest subgraphs in directed graphs in computational models for processing massive data. We consider two such models: Massively Parallel Computation (MPC) and semi-streaming. We show how to find a $(2+\varepsilon)$-approximation in $\tilde{O}(\sqrt{\log n})$ MPC rounds with sublinear memory per machine. This improves the state-of-the-art results by Bahmani et al. (WAW 2014) and Mitrovi\'c & Pan (ICML 2024). Moreover, we show how to find an $O(\log n)$-approximation in a single pass in semi-streaming. This is in stark contrast to prior work, which implies $\tilde{\Omega}(n^{1/6})$-approximation for a single pass; a better approximation is known only for randomized streams (Mitrovi\'c & Pan). This is the first deterministic single-pass semi-streaming algorithm for the densest subgraph problem, both for undirected and directed graphs. Our semi-streaming approach is also an insertion-only dynamic algorithm, attaining the first directed densest subgraph algorithm with $O(\log^2 n)$ worst-case update time while using sub-linear memory. We empirically evaluate our approaches in two ways. First, we illustrate that our single-pass semi-streaming algorithm performs much better than the theoretical guarantee. Specifically, its approximation on temporal datasets matches the $(2+\varepsilon)$-approximation of an $O(\log n)$-pass algorithm by Bahmani et al. (VLDB 2012). Second, we demonstrate that our MPC algorithm requires fewer rounds than prior work.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Slobodan Mitrović, Theodore Pan, Mahdi Qaempanah, Mohammad Amin Raeisi. 2025-09-26. New Parallel and Streaming Algorithms for Directed Densest Subgraph. https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.21729

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS