Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2510.05518

Time To Replace Your Filter: How Maplets Simplify System Design

Michael A. Bender·Alex Conway·Martín Farach-Colton·Rob Johnson·Prashant Pandey
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Filters such as Bloom, quotient, and cuckoo filters are fundamental building blocks providing space-efficient approximate set membership testing. However, many applications need to associate small values with keys-functionality that filters do not provide. This mismatch forces complex workarounds that degrade performance. We argue that maplets-space-efficient data structures for approximate key-value mappings-are the right abstraction. A maplet provides the same space benefits as filters while natively supporting key-value associations with one-sided error guarantees. Through detailed case studies of SplinterDB (LSM-based key-value store), Squeakr (k-mer counter), and Mantis (genomic sequence search), we identify the common patterns and demonstrate how a unified maplet abstraction can lead to simpler designs and better performance. We conclude that applications benefit from defaulting to maplets rather than filters across domains including databases, computational biology, and networking.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Michael A. Bender, Alex Conway, Martín Farach-Colton, Rob Johnson, Prashant Pandey. 2025-10-07. Time To Replace Your Filter: How Maplets Simplify System Design. https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.05518

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗