arXiv · 2510.09499
A methodology for clinically driven interactive segmentation evaluation
Abstract
Interactive segmentation is a promising strategy for building robust, generalisable algorithms for volumetric medical image segmentation. However, inconsistent and clinically unrealistic evaluation hinders fair comparison and misrepresents real-world performance. We propose a clinically grounded methodology for defining evaluation tasks and metrics, and built a software framework for constructing standardised evaluation pipelines. We evaluate state-of-the-art algorithms across heterogeneous and complex tasks and observe that (i) minimising information loss when processing user interactions is critical for model robustness, (ii) adaptive-zooming mechanisms boost robustness and speed convergence, (iii) performance drops if validation prompting behaviour/budgets differ from training, (iv) 2D methods perform well with slab-like images and coarse targets, but 3D context helps with large or irregularly shaped targets, (v) performance of non-medical-domain models (e.g. SAM2) degrades with poor contrast and complex shapes.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Parhom Esmaeili, Virginia Fernandez, Pedro Borges, Eli Gibson, Sebastien Ourselin, M. Jorge Cardoso. 2025-10-10. A methodology for clinically driven interactive segmentation evaluation. https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.09499
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.