Hypothesis testing for the dimension of random geometric graph

Mingao Yuan; Feng Yu

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2510.11844

Hypothesis testing for the dimension of random geometric graph

Mingao Yuan·Feng Yu

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Random geometric graphs (RGGs) offer a powerful tool for analyzing the geometric and dependence structures in real-world networks. For example, it has been observed that RGGs are a good model for protein-protein interaction networks. In RGGs, nodes are randomly distributed over an $m$-dimensional metric space, and edges connect the nodes if and only if their distance is less than some threshold. When fitting RGGs to real-world networks, the first step is probably to input or estimate the dimension $m$. However, it is not clear whether the prespecified dimension is equal to the true dimension. In this paper, we investigate this problem using hypothesis testing. Under the null hypothesis, the dimension is equal to a specific value, while the alternative hypothesis asserts the dimension is not equal to that value. We propose the first statistical test. Under the null hypothesis, the proposed test statistic converges in law to the standard normal distribution, and under the alternative hypothesis, the test statistic is unbounded in probability. We derive the asymptotic distribution by leveraging the asymptotic theory of degenerate U-statistics with kernel function dependent on the number of nodes. This approach differs significantly from prevailing methods used in network hypothesis testing problems. Moreover, we also propose an efficient approach to compute the test statistic based on the adjacency matrix. Simulation studies show that the proposed test performs well. We also apply the proposed test to multiple real-world networks to test their dimensions.

Explore related subjects

stat.ME

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Mingao Yuan, Feng Yu. 2025-10-13. Hypothesis testing for the dimension of random geometric graph. https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.11844

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Surprise Reduction and Nullification in Bayesian and Inverse Bayesian Inference under Ambiguous Prediction-Error Attribution

In non-stationary environments, prediction errors may signal environmental change or transient outliers, and adaptive systems must track such changes without overreacting to outliers. We distinguish surprise reduction, which updates beliefs to fit observations, from surprise nullification, which weakens constraints imposed by the predictive structure, and formalize both within Bayesian and inverse Bayesian (BIB) inference. Belief and likelihood updates are derived from variational objectives sharing a nullification strength, determined endogenously by minimizing surprise under the candidate post-update predictive distribution. In the Gaussian case, nullification expands belief and likelihood variances by a common factor relative to standard Bayesian updating, leaving the ratio unchanged. BIB thus defers attribution of the prediction error, committing to neither latent-state change nor observation-process uncertainty. The nullification strength is carried over as a candidate and is maintained or released according to the predictive surprise of the next observation. In a mean estimation task with outliers and changepoints, no scanned parameter setting of a Sage-Husa-type adaptive Kalman filter, fixed-strength BIB variant, or belief-forgetting-only variant outperforms BIB in both changepoint tracking and post-outlier stability. An oracle-informed reduced Bayesian model tracks changepoints better but is less stable after outliers. Although BIB maintains no explicit hypotheses about changepoints or outliers, it generates event-dependent dynamics. The learning rate increases after changepoints, whereas after outliers, nullification is released, and this increase is suppressed. Deferring attribution and letting subsequent observations differentiate the responses may constitute a principle of adaptive inference in non-stationary environments.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2026

Generalized Ridge Refitting for the Lasso and Prediction Improvement Bounds

We study a class of Lasso based estimators obtained by applying a quadratic correction on the Lasso equicorrelation set. The penalty matrix determines both the magnitude and geometry of the correction and contains, among other cases, the isotropic Lasso--Ridge correction, least squares refitting, Gram proportional interpolation between the Lasso and least squares, and coordinate specific penalties. We first derive a closed form representation and isolate the positive gain component of the resulting prediction improvement. We then control the remaining stochastic linear term in expectation by localizing the random signed equicorrelation model around a deterministic reference support. This yields a finite sample expectation bound that explicitly accounts for the randomness induced by Lasso model selection. The resulting decomposition provides a unified framework for understanding when Lasso based quadratic corrections can improve prediction.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2026

Discretization in covariate-adaptive randomization: gains and losses

Covariate-adaptive randomization(CAR) is widely implemented in clinical trials to balance prognostic covariates across treatment arms. Continuous covariates are often discretized into strata in practice, yet their consequences are not clearly understood. This paper provides a comprehensive study of the impact of discretization on both the CAR design process and the inferential results thereafter. We establish the asymptotic properties of both imbalance measures and treatment effect estimators under discretized and non-discretized settings. Practical recommendations are given on when and how discretization should be employed. We show that discretization in design is generally recommended, as it enhances robustness against model misspecification. However, if the true model is known, the most efficient strategy is to balance covariates according to that model in the design. The theoretical results are corroborated by extensive simulation studies and an empirical application to a diabetes trial dataset. Together, the results clarify the gains and losses of discretization in CAR and pave the way for learning impact of discretization to other designs and beyond.

stat.ME↗