SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2510.15933

Nicht-algebraische Didaktik nicht-diagonalisierbarer Matrizen

Abstract

This article offers a motivating travel guide towards the Jordan normal form, one of the highlights in courses on linear algebra or advanced mathematics. Its itinerary is characterized by a focus on core geometric aspects and the avoidance of algebraic tools. In this way, it attempts to encourage academic lecturers from more applied mathematical contexts to devote more time to one of the most exciting structures of linear algebra in their courses, rather than rushing through it, often using just a definition. -- -- Dieser Artikel bietet einen motivierenden Reisef\"uhrer zur Jordanschen Normalform, einem der H\"ohepunkte in Lehrveranstaltungen zu Linearer Algebra oder H\"oherer Mathematik, an. Seine Reiseroute zeichnet sich durch die Besinnung auf geometrische Kernaspekte und den Verzicht auf algebraische Hilfsmittel aus. Er versucht so, Hochschuldozenten aus mathematisch angewandteren Kontexten zu ermutigen, einer der spannendsten Strukturen der Linearen Algebra mehr Zeit in ihren Lehrveranstaltungen einzur\"aumen, anstatt allzu hastig, und nicht selten nur mittels einer Definition, \"uber sie hinweg zu gehen.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Mario Teixeira Parente. 2025-10-06. Nicht-algebraische Didaktik nicht-diagonalisierbarer Matrizen. https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.15933

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Perspectives on the unit distance problem

This is a survey on an old open problem in combinatorics called the unit distance problem, and the field of mathematics around it, called incidence geometry. What do we know about the problem? Why is it difficult? How does it connect with other parts of math?

math.HO

A Categorical Approach to Euclidean Ratios and Proportions

A categorial approach to the non-metric geometry in Books V and VI of Euclid's \textit{Elements} is presented. Specifically, we introduce a diagrammatic syntax that can be overlaid immediately on his diagrams, thus bridging intuitive presentation with fidelity to Euclid's arguments. This syntax makes complicated definitions like V.5, and indeed the arguments throughout books V and VI, including arguments about similar figures, intuitively clear. We show in an appendix that this syntax can be used to solve a puzzle regarding ancient mathematics. Finally, we offer evidence that this approach to Euclidean diagrams is rooted in the Aristotelian tradition itself, and that a similar syntax was utilized, in antiquity, for related questions of numeric and proportions. Thus the syntax is plausibly faithful to Euclid's own thought-world, and not an outside-imposition.

math.HO

Some Early Results by Tutte Regarding the Cycle Double Cover Conjecture in 1948

OpenAI recently announced a proof of the Cycle Double Cover (CDC) Conjecture. Most media reports have characterized it as a 50-year-old open problem. In reality, according to a 1987 letter from Tutte to Fleischner, the Cycle Double Cover Problem has been open for at least 80 years. Two early results regarding the CDC conjecture were established in one of Tutte's 1949 publications.

math.HO