SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2510.16224

Prediction Intervals for Model Averaging

Abstract

A rich set of frequentist model averaging methods has been developed, but their applications have largely been limited to point prediction, as measuring prediction uncertainty in general settings remains an open problem. In this paper we propose prediction intervals for model averaging based on conformal inference. These intervals cover out-of-sample realizations of the outcome variable with a pre-specified probability, providing a way to assess predictive uncertainty beyond point prediction. The framework allows general model misspecification and applies to averaging across multiple models that can be nested, disjoint, overlapping, or any combination thereof, with weights that may depend on the estimation sample. We establish coverage guarantees under two sets of assumptions: exact finite-sample validity under exchangeability, relevant for cross-sectional data, and asymptotic validity under stationarity, relevant for time-series data. We first present a benchmark algorithm and then introduce a locally adaptive refinement and split-sample procedures that broaden applicability. The methods are illustrated with a cross-sectional application to real estate appraisal and a time-series application to equity premium forecasting.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Zhongjun Qu, Wendun Wang, Xiaomeng Zhang. 2025-10-17. Prediction Intervals for Model Averaging. https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.16224

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Identification in Linear Quantile Panel Models

This paper studies identification in linear quantile panel models with unrestricted individual heterogeneity when the number of time periods is fixed and small. We impose strict exogeneity, whereby the conditional quantile restriction holds given the individual's complete regressor history and latent individual effect, but otherwise allow the disturbances to be arbitrarily dependent over time.

econ.EM

Experimental Design for Policy Choice

We show how to optimally design experiments when the resulting data will be used to choose a welfare-maximizing policy subject to constraints. A decision maker seeks to maximize Bayes expected welfare by choosing a policy whose effects depend on an unknown finite-dimensional parameter. The decision maker has access to a first wave of experimental data with a fixed design but may choose the design of a second wave that will be collected before choosing the policy. The resulting experimental design--policy choice problem is a very high-dimensional dynamic program that is generally intractable in finite samples. We propose a tractable approximation based on the limit experiment and show it is asymptotically optimal using a new asymptotic representation theorem for adaptive experiments with continuous treatments. We apply the method to a conditional cash transfer experiment and demonstrate the potential for large gains from tailoring the experiment to the policy choice.

econ.EM

Designing Spatial Treatments

Spatial treatments are interventions assigned to locations potentially distinct from those of the responding units. We study their optimal design under a general model in which a unit's response diminishes with distance to a treated site. Our estimand of interest is an ``uncontaminated'' effect equal to the average impact of a single intervention site over all hypothetical sites. We propose a novel design based on a Mat\'{e}rn point process which separates treatments by a distance of at least $r$. A larger choice of $r$ reduces bias by separating interventions but increases variance by reducing their numerosity. We choose $r$ to maximize the rate of convergence of a Horvitz-Thompson estimator and prove that this is minimax rate-optimal. We provide weak conditions under which the estimator is asymptotically normal and propose a variance estimator.

econ.EM