SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2510.19049

From Unweighted to Weighted Dynamic Matching in Non-Bipartite Graphs: A Low-Loss Reduction

Abstract

We study the approximate maximum weight matching (MWM) problem in a fully dynamic graph subject to edge insertions and deletions. We design meta-algorithms that reduce the problem to the unweighted approximate maximum cardinality matching (MCM) problem. Despite recent progress on bipartite graphs -- Bernstein-Dudeja-Langley (STOC 2021) and Bernstein-Chen-Dudeja-Langley-Sidford-Tu (SODA 2025) -- the only previous meta-algorithm that applied to non-bipartite graphs suffered a $\frac{1}{2}$ approximation loss (Stubbs-Williams, ITCS 2017). We significantly close the weighted-and-unweighted gap by showing the first low-loss reduction that transforms any fully dynamic $(1-\varepsilon)$-approximate MCM algorithm on bipartite graphs into a fully dynamic $(1-\varepsilon)$-approximate MWM algorithm on general (not necessarily bipartite) graphs, with only a $\mathrm{poly}(\log n/\varepsilon)$ overhead in the update time. Central to our approach is a new primal-dual framework that reduces the computation of an approximate MWM in general graphs to a sequence of approximate induced matching queries on an auxiliary bipartite extension. In addition, we give the first conditional lower bound on approximate partially dynamic matching with worst-case update time.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Aaron Bernstein, Jiale Chen. 2025-10-21. From Unweighted to Weighted Dynamic Matching in Non-Bipartite Graphs: A Low-Loss Reduction. https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.19049

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS