SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2510.19815

Explaining the Inherent Tradeoffs for Suffix Array Functionality: Equivalences between String Problems and Prefix Range Queries

Abstract

We study the fundamental question of how efficiently suffix array entries can be accessed when the array cannot be stored explicitly. The suffix array $SA_T[1..n]$ of a text $T$ of length $n$ encodes the lexicographic order of its suffixes and underlies numerous applications in pattern matching, data compression, and bioinformatics. Previous work established one-way reductions showing how suffix array queries can be answered using, for example, rank queries on the Burrows-Wheeler Transform. More recently, a new class of prefix queries was introduced, together with reductions that, among others, transform a simple tradeoff for prefix-select queries into a suffix array tradeoff matching state-of-the-art space and query-time bounds, while achieving sublinear construction time. For binary texts, the resulting data structure achieves space $O(n)$ bits, preprocessing time $O(n / \sqrt{\log n})$, preprocessing space of $O(n)$ bits, and query time $O(\log^{\epsilon} n)$ for any constant $\epsilon > 0$. However, whether these bounds could be improved using different techniques has remained open. We resolve this question by presenting the first bidirectional reduction showing that suffix array queries are, up to an additive $O(\log\log n)$ term in query time, equivalent to prefix-select queries in all parameters. This result unifies prior approaches and shows that essentially all efficient suffix array representations can be expressed via prefix-select structures. Moreover, we prove analogous equivalences for inverse suffix array queries, pattern ranking, lexicographic range, and SA-interval queries, identifying six core problem pairs that connect string and prefix query models. Our framework thus provides a unified foundation for analyzing and improving the efficiency of fundamental string-processing problems through the lens of prefix queries.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Dominik Kempa, Tomasz Kociumaka. 2025-10-22. Explaining the Inherent Tradeoffs for Suffix Array Functionality: Equivalences between String Problems and Prefix Range Queries. https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.19815

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS