Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2510.20053

Parallel Joinable B-Trees in the Fork-Join I/O Model

Michael Goodrich·Yan Gu·Ryuto Kitagawa·Yihan Sun
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Balanced search trees are widely used in computer science to efficiently maintain dynamic ordered data. To support efficient set operations (e.g., union, intersection, difference) using trees, the join-based framework is widely studied. This framework has received particular attention in the parallel setting, and has been shown to be effective in enabling simple and theoretically efficient set operations on trees. Despite the widespread adoption of parallel join-based trees, a major drawback of previous work on such data structures is the inefficiency of their input/output (I/O) access patterns. Some recent work (e.g., C-trees and PaC-trees) focused on more I/O-friendly implementations of these algorithms. Surprisingly, however, there have been no results on bounding the I/O-costs for these algorithms. It remains open whether these algorithms can provide tight, provable guarantees in I/O-costs on trees. This paper studies efficient parallel algorithms for set operations based on search tree algorithms using a join-based framework, with a special focus on achieving I/O efficiency in these algorithms. To better capture the I/O-efficiency in these algorithms in parallel, we introduce a new computational model, Fork-Join I/O Model, to measure the I/O costs in fork-join parallelism. This model measures the total block transfers (I/O work) and their critical path (I/O span). Under this model, we propose our new solution based on B-trees. Our parallel algorithm computes the union, intersection, and difference of two B-trees with $O(m \log_B(n/m))$ I/O work and $O(\log_B m \cdot \log_2 \log_B n + \log_B n)$ I/O span, where $n$ and $m \leq n$ are the sizes of the two trees, and $B$ is the block size.

Explore related subjects

cs.DScs.DC

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Michael Goodrich, Yan Gu, Ryuto Kitagawa, Yihan Sun. 2025-10-22. Parallel Joinable B-Trees in the Fork-Join I/O Model. https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.20053

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗