SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2510.21058

Hardness of Approximation for Shortest Path with Vector Costs

Abstract

We obtain hardness of approximation results for the $\ell_p$-Shortest Path problem, a variant of the classic Shortest Path problem with vector costs. For every integer $p \in [2,\infty)$, we show a hardness of $\Omega(p(\log n / \log^2\log n)^{1-1/p})$ for both polynomial- and quasi-polynomial-time approximation algorithms. This nearly matches the approximation factor of $O(p(\log n / \log\log n)^{1-1/p})$ achieved by a quasi-polynomial-time algorithm of Makarychev, Ovsiankin, and Tani (ICALP 2025). No hardness of approximation results were previously known for any $p < \infty$. We also present results for the case where $p$ is a function of $n$. For $p = \infty$, we establish a hardness of $\tilde\Omega(\log^2 n)$, improving upon the previous $\tilde\Omega(\log n)$ hardness result. Our result nearly matches the $O(\log^2 n)$ approximation guarantee of the quasi-polynomial-time algorithm by Li, Xu, and Zhang (ICALP 2025). Finally, we present asymptotic bounds on higher-order Bell numbers, which might be of independent interest.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Charlie Carlson, Yury Makarychev, Ron Mosenzon. 2025-10-24. Hardness of Approximation for Shortest Path with Vector Costs. https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.21058

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS