Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2511.00184

Scheduling Problems with Constrained Rejections

Sami Davies·Venkatesan Guruswami·Xuandi Ren
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We study bicriteria versions of Makespan Minimization on Unrelated Machines and Santa Claus by allowing a constrained number of rejections. Given an instance of Makespan Minimization on Unrelated Machines where the optimal makespan for scheduling $n$ jobs on $m$ unrelated machines is $T$, (Feige and Vondr\'ak, 2006) gave an algorithm that schedules a $(1-1/e+10^{-180})$ fraction of jobs in time $T$. We show the ratio can be improved to $0.6533>1-1/e+0.02$ if we allow makespan $3T/2$. To the best our knowledge, this is the first result examining the tradeoff between makespan and the fraction of scheduled jobs when the makespan is not $T$ or $2T$. For the Santa Claus problem (the Max-Min version of Makespan Minimization), the analogous bicriteria objective was studied by (Golovin, 2005), who gave an algorithm providing an allocation so a $(1-1/k)$ fraction of agents receive value at least $T/k$, for any $k \in \mathbb{Z}^+$ and $T$ being the optimal minimum value every agent can receive. We provide the first hardness result by showing there are constants $\delta,\varepsilon>0$ such that it is NP-hard to find an allocation where a $(1-\delta)$ fraction of agents receive value at least $(1-\varepsilon) T$. To prove this hardness result, we introduce a bicriteria version of Set Packing, which may be of independent interest, and prove some algorithmic and hardness results for it. Overall, we believe these bicriteria scheduling problems warrant further study as they provide an interesting lens to understand how robust the difficulty of the original optimization goal might be.

Explore related subjects

cs.DScs.CC

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Sami Davies, Venkatesan Guruswami, Xuandi Ren. 2025-10-31. Scheduling Problems with Constrained Rejections. https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.00184

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗