Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2511.00739

Towards Understanding, Analyzing, and Optimizing Agentic AI Execution: A CPU-Centric Perspective

Ritik Raj·Souvik Kundu·Ishita Vohra·Hong Wang·Tushar Krishna
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Agentic AI serving converts monolithic LLM-based inference to autonomous problem-solvers that can plan, call tools, perform reasoning, and adapt on the fly. Due to diverse task execution need, such serving heavily rely on heterogeneous CPU-GPU systems with majority of the external tools responsible for agentic capability, either run on or are orchestrated by the CPU. Towards having a deeper understanding of its role, this paper aims to characterize and analyze the system bottlenecks introduced by agentic AI workloads from a largely overlooked CPU-centric perspective. We first present a compile-time characterization of agentic AI execution and choose representative workloads to capture the algorithmic diversity. We then perform runtime characterization of the representative workloads analyzing the end-to-end latency and throughput on two different hardware systems to isolate respective architectural bottlenecks. Based on the insights on the bottlenecks, we finally present two scheduling optimizations, namely, 1. CPU-Aware Overlapped Micro-Batching (COMB) and 2. Mixed Agentic Scheduling (MAS) on homogeneous and heterogeneous agentic workloads, respectively. In specific, these methods optimize for improved CPU-GPU concurrent utilization while reducing skewed resource allocation for heterogeneous execution. Experimental evaluations on the two hardware systems demonstrate the efficacy of COMB in yielding up to 1.7x lower P50 latency in standalone homogeneous workload execution and up to 3.9x/1.8x lower service/total latency under homogeneous open-loop load. Additionally, for heterogeneous open-loop load, MAS can reduce the total latency for minority request-type by up to 2.37x/2.49x at P50/P90 percentile.

Explore related subjects

cs.AIcs.LGcs.MA

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Ritik Raj, Souvik Kundu, Ishita Vohra, Hong Wang, Tushar Krishna. 2025-11-01. Towards Understanding, Analyzing, and Optimizing Agentic AI Execution: A CPU-Centric Perspective. https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.00739

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Decoupling Readiness from Release for Tail-Aware Scheduling of Agentic LLM Workflows

Agentic LLM workflows consist of sequences of model turns interleaved with tool interactions, so their end-to-end completion time depends not only on inference speed but also on when ready turns are released. Most runtimes release each turn immediately upon readiness. Under contention, this eager release policy can accumulate released but unfinished work; once submitted, those turns can no longer be reordered by the workflow-level policy, increasing tail latency. We present a tail-risk-aware turn release scheduling method that jointly decides which ready turn to release next and how much released but unfinished work to maintain. The method uses a mean--Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR) objective to capture the evolving tail risk of unfinished workflows, incorporates online estimates of turn work when prioritizing ready turns, and adapts the released work budget to observed queue pressure. We evaluate the method using real agent execution traces from software engineering tasks across multiple LLMs and workflow arrival rates. The method performs comparably to eager release under light load and substantially reduces the P95 of workflow flow time under contention, achieving up to a \(3.50\times\) speedup.

cs.AI↗
arXiv2026

Demystifying the Privacy-Utility Trade-off in LLM Interactions

The integration of Large Language Models into daily tasks relies on context-rich instructions, inevitably exposing sensitive user information. Current privacy-preserving methods typically employ context-agnostic static rules, causing severe utility degradation. However, the specific mechanisms governing how sanitization impacts downstream performance remain largely underexplored. To address this, we conduct a systematic analysis to deconstruct the privacy-utility trade-off, uncovering three underlying mechanisms: (1) Context-Dependent Utility, which first establishes when to sanitize by revealing that data value shifts from critical constraints to dispensable noise based on user intent; (2) Strategic Adaptation, which subsequently determines how to sanitize by dictating that the choice between removal and replacement depends on the task's reliance on factual integrity versus structural coherence; and (3) Combinatorial Interplay, which finally extends the protection scope by demonstrating that attributes form a semantic web of synergistic dependencies or antagonistic redundancies. Guided by these insights, we introduce an intent-driven local protection framework. By distilling a lightweight model Veilmind-4B to drive a dynamic extraction-sanitization-restoration pipeline, our approach reaches a low-leakage privacy point while preserving substantially higher response utility than existing privacy-oriented baselines, advancing the privacy-utility trade-off toward the Pareto frontier.

cs.AI↗
arXiv2026

Defining AI Agents: A Compendium of Criteria, Metrics, and Benchmarks

The term agent in artificial intelligence lacks a standard definition, complicating the evaluation, comparison, and reproducibility of AI agent research. We address this ambiguity through a survey organized around five dimensions of agenticness: environmental interaction, learning and adaptation, autonomy, goal-directed behavior, and temporal coherence. For each dimension, we examine how the underlying capability has been conceptualized across prior work and synthesize the metrics, benchmarks, and evaluation frameworks used to assess it. This review provides a structured account of the current landscape of agent evaluation, highlighting both established approaches and areas where evaluation remains limited or inconsistent. We additionally introduce the Agent Compendium, a public-facing digital resource that organizes and extends the evaluation methods identified through this review. Together, the survey and compendium provide a common structure for evaluating and comparing agent capabilities across AI systems, supporting more reproducible research, clearer communication, and more systematic study of artificial agents.

cs.AI↗