SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2511.03340

Branch-and-Cut for Computing Approximate Equilibria of Mixed-Integer Generalized Nash Games

Abstract

Generalized Nash equilibrium problems with mixed-integer variables constitute an important class of games in which each player solves a mixed-integer optimization problem, where both the objective and the feasible set is parameterized by the rivals' strategies. However, such games are known for failing to admit exact equilibria and also the assumption of all players being able to solve nonconvex problems to global optimality is questionable. This motivates the study of approximate equilibria. In this work, we consider an approximation concept that incorporates both multiplicative and additive relaxations of optimality. We propose a branch-and-cut (B&C) method that computes such approximate equilibria or proves its non-existence. For this, we adopt the idea of intersection cuts and show the existence of such cuts under the condition that the constraints are linear and each player's cost function is either convex in the entire strategy profile, or, concave in the entire strategy profile and linear in the rivals' strategies. For the special case of standard Nash equilibrium problems, we introduce an alternative type of cut and show that the method terminates finitely, provided that each player has only finitely many distinct best-response sets. Finally, on the basis of the B&C method, we introduce a single-tree binary-search method to compute best-approximate equilibria under some simplifying assumptions. We implemented these methods and present numerical results for a class of mixed-integer flow games.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Aloïs Duguet, Tobias Harks, Martin Schmidt, Julian Schwarz. 2025-11-05. Branch-and-Cut for Computing Approximate Equilibria of Mixed-Integer Generalized Nash Games. https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.03340

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

MMS Allocation for Chores with Online Agent Arrivals

We study the fair allocation of $m$ indivisible chores to $n$ agents with subadditive cost functions arriving online in an arbitrary order. Upon an agent's arrival, we are informed of her cost function and must irrevocably assign her a set of chores. We focus on the Maximin Share (MMS) fairness notion and aim to compute an allocation in which all items are assigned, and no agent incurs a cost more than $\alpha$ times her MMS. Without any prior information about the instance (other than $n$ and $m$), we design an algorithm with a competitive ratio of $O(\min\{n, k\log^{1+\epsilon}k, \log m\})$ for any constant $\epsilon > 0$, where $k$ denotes the number of cost function types. Our bound matches the best known offline approximation guarantees for MMS under subadditive costs and is nearly optimal with respect to all three parameters: we show that even for binary additive cost functions, no online algorithm can achieve a competitive ratio of $o(\min\{n, k\log k, \log m\})$. We then consider the setting in which the $k$ cost function types are known in advance (though the realized types of arriving agents are not). For additive cost functions, we provide an algorithm with a competitive ratio of $O(\min\{\log k, \log(kn)/\log\log(kn)\})$, and show that constant-competitive algorithms do not exist for general $k$, even for the binary additive setting. For binary additive functions when $k \le n$, we propose a $3$-competitive algorithm and establish a lower bound of $2$.

cs.GT

Truncated Noisy Best-Response Algorithms: Toward Game Theoretic Learning with Safety Guarantees

We consider a game theoretic approach to solve multi-agent coordination problems with submodular maximization objectives. It is known for such problems that the Nash equilibria for the corresponding game are always within 50% of the optimal, but that the equilibria which achieve this worst-case bound are not stable. To exploit this instability, we propose a family of algorithms which we call Truncated Noisy Best-Response (TNBR) Algorithms. These algorithms are flexibly characterized by agents asynchronously and stochastically selecting actions from a neighbourhood of their best response payoffs. We compute bounds on the recurrent classes of TNBR algorithms' associated Markov chains. Our bounds fall into two categories: first, "Performance" bounds ensure that TNBR algorithms always have a high-value recurrent state; second, "Safety" bounds ensure that TNBR algorithms never have arbitrarily-bad recurrent states. Furthermore, these two types of bounds are linked by a waterbed-like effect: every game with a poor Safety guarantee necessarily has a favorable Performance guarantee.

cs.GT

Existence of the Core in Approval-Based Committee Elections

We settle the main open question in the theory of approval-based multi-winner elections: we show that there always exists a committee in the core. The core is a stability and group fairness concept. The proof introduces a new voting rule that optimizes an entropy-like objective function over committees and payment systems. All local optima of this objective function lie in the core, which implies that a core committee can be found in polynomial time.

cs.GT