SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2511.03461

Dynamic Meta-Kernelization

Abstract

Kernelization studies polynomial-time preprocessing algorithms. Over the last 20 years, the most celebrated positive results of the field have been linear kernels for classical NP-hard graph problems on sparse graph classes. In this paper, we lift these results to the dynamic setting. As the canonical example, Alber, Fellows, and Niedermeier [J. ACM 2004] gave a linear kernel for dominating set on planar graphs. We provide the following dynamic version of their kernel: Our data structure is initialized with an $n$-vertex planar graph $G$ in $O(n \log n)$ amortized time, and, at initialization, outputs a planar graph $K$ with $\mathrm{OPT}(K) = \mathrm{OPT}(G)$ and $|K| = O(\mathrm{OPT}(G))$, where $\mathrm{OPT}(\cdot)$ denotes the size of a minimum dominating set. The graph $G$ can be updated by insertions and deletions of edges and isolated vertices in $O(\log n)$ amortized time per update, under the promise that it remains planar. After each update to $G$, the data structure outputs $O(1)$ updates to $K$, maintaining $\mathrm{OPT}(K) = \mathrm{OPT}(G)$, $|K| = O(\mathrm{OPT}(G))$, and planarity of $K$. Furthermore, we obtain similar dynamic kernelization algorithms for all problems satisfying certain conditions on (topological-)minor-free graph classes. Besides kernelization, this directly implies new dynamic constant-approximation algorithms and improvements to dynamic FPT algorithms for such problems. Our main technical contribution is a dynamic data structure for maintaining an approximately optimal protrusion decomposition of a dynamic topological-minor-free graph. Protrusion decompositions were introduced by Bodlaender, Fomin, Lokshtanov, Penninkx, Saurabh, and Thilikos [J. ACM 2016], and have since developed into a part of the core toolbox in kernelization and parameterized algorithms.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Christian Bertram, Deborah Haun, Mads Vestergaard Jensen, Tuukka Korhonen. 2025-11-05. Dynamic Meta-Kernelization. https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.03461

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS