SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2511.11196

Ordinal Analysis of Well-Ordering Principles, Well Quasi-Orders Closure Properties, and $\Sigma_n$-Collection Schema

Abstract

The study of well quasi-orders, wqo, is a cornerstone of combinatorics and within wqo theory Kruskal's theorem plays a crucial role. Extending previous proof-theoretic results, we calculate the $\Pi^1_1$ ordinals of two different versions of labelled Kruskal's theorem: $\forall n \,$ $\mbox{KT}_\ell(n)$ and $\mbox{KT}_{\omega}(n)$; denoting, respectively, all the cases of labelled Kruskal's theorem for trees with an upper bound on the branching degree, and the standard Kruskal's theorem for labelled trees. In order to reach these computations, a key step is to move from Kruskal's theorem, which regards preservation of wqo's, to an equivalent Well-Ordering Principle (WOP), regarding instead preservation of well-orders. Given an ordinal function $g$, WOP$(g)$ amounts to the following principle $\forall X\, [\mbox{WO}(X) \rightarrow \mbox{WO}(g(X))]$, where $WO(X)$ states that ``$X$ is a well-order''. In our case, the two ordinal functions involved are ${g}_{\forall}(X)=\sup_{n}\vartheta(\Omega^n \cdot X)$ and ${g}_{\omega}(X)=\vartheta(\Omega^{\omega}\! \cdot X)$. In addition to the ordinal analysis of Kruskal's theorem and its related WOP, a series of Well Quasi-orders Principles (WQP) is considered. Given a set operation $G$ that preserves the property of being a wqo, its Well Quasi-orders closure Property, WQP$(G)$, is given by the principle $\forall Q\, [Q\, \mbox{wqo} \rightarrow G(Q)\, \mbox{wqo}]$. Conducting this study, unexpected connections with different principles arising from Ramsey and Computational theory, such as RT$^2_{<\infty}$, CAC, ADS, RT$^1_{<\infty}$, turn up. Lastly, extending and combining previous results, we achieve also the ordinal analysis of the collection schema $\mbox{B}\Sigma_n$.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Gabriele Buriola, Andreas Weiermann. 2025-11-14. Ordinal Analysis of Well-Ordering Principles, Well Quasi-Orders Closure Properties, and $\Sigma_n$-Collection Schema. https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.11196

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

There is no maximal $K$-degree

The Kolmogorov complexity of a string characterize how complex it is to describe the string. If every prefix of a real $x$ is more complex to describe than every prefix (of the same length) of real $y$, then it is seen as $x$ is more complex to describe than $y$. It is wondered if there is a real $x$ so that no other reals are strictly more complex (to describe) than $x$. The behavior of Kolmogorov complexity functions generated by reals (namely $n\mapsto$ the minimal description length of the real) is quite chaos. Therefore, it is widely believed that there are many reals that are maximally complex to describe. For instance, it is conjectured that all random enough reals have maximal $K$-degree. In this paper, it is shown that there is no real with maximal $K$-degree. Actually, for almost all real $x$, we can uniformly computably find another real whose $K$-degree is strictly above $x$.

math.LO

Quadruples and cubes

We prove, in $\mathsf{ZFC}$, that the $\lambda$-terraced cube relation fails whenever $\lambda$ is an uncountable cardinal. The corresponding terraced relation for quadruples fails for every $\lambda$. If $\lambda$ is $\aleph_0$ then the pretinent terraced relation has consistency strength of at least one Woodin cardinal. We prove positive polarized relations at a successor and a double successor from wondrous ideals. We show, however, that there are no such ideals over two consecutive cardinals simultaneously.

math.LO

Possibilistic Logic over a Logic of Formal Inconsistency

In this article, we have introduced a new possibilistic logic on a logic of formal inconsistency with the aim of developing a possibility theoretic framework to deal with uncertainty and inconsistency meaningfully without leading to a system collapse. We have discussed the syntax and semantics for this logic and have proved the soundness and completeness theorems. A set of new measures of consistency, contradictoriness, and triviality of a set of formulas have been defined. These have then been put to use in an example to show that this framework can provide better means of machine reasoning.

math.LO