Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2511.13014

Maximal Palindromes in MPC: Simple and Optimal

Solon P. Pissis
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

In the classical longest palindromic substring (LPS) problem, we are given a string $S$ of length $n$, and the task is to output a longest palindromic substring in $S$. Gilbert, Hajiaghayi, Saleh, and Seddighin [SPAA 2023] showed how to solve the LPS problem in the Massively Parallel Computation (MPC) model in $\mathcal{O}(1)$ rounds using $\mathcal{\widetilde{O}}(n)$ total memory, with $\mathcal{\widetilde{O}}(n^{1-\epsilon})$ memory per machine, for any $\epsilon \in (0,0.5]$. We present a simple and optimal algorithm to solve the LPS problem in the MPC model in $\mathcal{O}(1)$ rounds. The total time and memory are $\mathcal{O}(n)$, with $\mathcal{O}(n^{1-\epsilon})$ memory per machine, for any $\epsilon \in (0,0.5]$. A key attribute of our algorithm is its ability to compute all maximal palindromes in the same complexities. Furthermore, our new insights allow us to bypass the constraint $\epsilon \in (0,0.5]$ in the Adaptive MPC model. Our algorithms and the one proposed by Gilbert et al. for the LPS problem are randomized and succeed with high probability.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Solon P. Pissis. 2025-11-17. Maximal Palindromes in MPC: Simple and Optimal. https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.13014

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗