SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2511.16023

Real Time Proportional Throughput Maximization: How much advance notice should you give your scheduler?

Abstract

We will be exploring a generalization of real time scheduling problem sometimes called the real time throughput maximization problem. Our input is a sequence of jobs specified by their release time, deadline and processing time. We assume that jobs are announced before or at their release time. At each time step, the algorithm must decide whether to schedule a job based on the information so far. The goal is to maximize the value of the sum of the processing times of jobs that finish before their deadline, this is often called real time throughput with proportional weights. We extend this problem by defining a notion of \(t\)-advance-notice, a measure of how far in advance each job is announced relative to their processing time. We show that there exists a class of algorithms \(\tau-\textsc{Persist}\) parametrized by some value \(\tau\in [1,\infty)\). If an input sequence has \(t\)-advance-notice, \(\tau-\textsc{Persist}\) is \(\frac{\tau - 1}{\tau^2 +\tau - 1}\)-competitive. In particular, we show that for any \(t \leq \frac{1}{2}\), there is an algorithm that achieves \(\frac{t-t^2}{1+t-t^2}\)-competitiveness and for any \(t \geq \frac{1}{2}\), there is an algorithm that achieves \(\frac{1}{5}\)-competitiveness. We also give an upper bound of any algorithm that relies on input sequences having \(t\)-advance-notice. We show that the competitive ratio of any algorithm can be at most \(\frac{t}{2t+1}\) against input sequences that have \(t\)-advance-notice. In particular, we show that regardless of how much advance-notice is given, no algorithm can reach \(\frac{1}{2}\)-competitiveness.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Nadim A. Mottu. 2025-11-20. Real Time Proportional Throughput Maximization: How much advance notice should you give your scheduler?. https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.16023

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS