Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2511.18460

Steiner Forest: A Simplified Better-Than-2 Approximation

Anupam Gupta·Vera Traub
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

In the Steiner Forest problem, we are given a graph with edge lengths, and a collection of demand pairs; the goal is to find a subgraph of least total length such that each demand pair is connected in this subgraph. For over twenty years, the best approximation ratio known for the problem was a $2$-approximation due to Agrawal, Klein, and Ravi (STOC 1991), despite many attempts to surpass this bound. Finally, in a recent breakthrough, Ahmadi, Gholami, Hajiaghayi, Jabbarzade, and Mahdavi (FOCS 2025) gave a $2-\varepsilon$-approximation, where $\varepsilon \approx 10^{-11}$. In this work, we show how to simplify and extend the work of Ahmadi et al. to obtain an improved $1.994$-approximation. We combine some ideas from their work (e.g., an extended run of the moat-growing primal-dual algorithm, and identifying autarkic pairs) with other ideas -- submodular maximization to find components to contract, as in the relative greedy algorithms for Steiner tree, and the use of autarkic triples. We hope that our cleaner abstraction will open the way for further improvements.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Anupam Gupta, Vera Traub. 2025-11-23. Steiner Forest: A Simplified Better-Than-2 Approximation. https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.18460

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗