SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2511.18550

Robust Inference Methods for Latent Group Panel Models under Possible Group Non-Separation

Abstract

We develop robust inference methods for general linear hypotheses in linear panel data models with latent group structure in the coefficients. We employ a selective conditional inference approach based on the conditional distribution of coefficient estimates given the group structure estimated from the data. The resulting inference procedures remain valid even when group separation fails (i.e., when the distributional properties of the group-specific coefficients are not established) and, because they account for uncertainty in estimating the group structure, they also improve on conventional asymptotic procedures in finite samples when separation does hold. Our tests are exactly valid under Gaussian errors with known variances and asymptotically valid under general error distributions. Unlike much of the post-clustering inference literature, which focuses on testing group homogeneity, our framework accommodates arbitrary linear restrictions on the group-specific coefficients. Inverting the conditional tests yields selective confidence sets with valid coverage conditional on the estimated group structure. We illustrate the methods through Monte Carlo simulations and an application to growth convergence clubs. Simulations demonstrate accurate size control and good power in finite samples, including in the presence of serial correlation and cross-sectional dependence. The applications show sharp differences between the traditional inference methods and robust methods proposed in this paper, illustrating the importance of taking the estimated group structure into account.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Oguzhan Akgun, Ryo Okui. 2025-11-23. Robust Inference Methods for Latent Group Panel Models under Possible Group Non-Separation. https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.18550

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Identification in Linear Quantile Panel Models

This paper studies identification in linear quantile panel models with unrestricted individual heterogeneity when the number of time periods is fixed and small. We impose strict exogeneity, whereby the conditional quantile restriction holds given the individual's complete regressor history and latent individual effect, but otherwise allow the disturbances to be arbitrarily dependent over time.

econ.EM

Experimental Design for Policy Choice

We show how to optimally design experiments when the resulting data will be used to choose a welfare-maximizing policy subject to constraints. A decision maker seeks to maximize Bayes expected welfare by choosing a policy whose effects depend on an unknown finite-dimensional parameter. The decision maker has access to a first wave of experimental data with a fixed design but may choose the design of a second wave that will be collected before choosing the policy. The resulting experimental design--policy choice problem is a very high-dimensional dynamic program that is generally intractable in finite samples. We propose a tractable approximation based on the limit experiment and show it is asymptotically optimal using a new asymptotic representation theorem for adaptive experiments with continuous treatments. We apply the method to a conditional cash transfer experiment and demonstrate the potential for large gains from tailoring the experiment to the policy choice.

econ.EM

Designing Spatial Treatments

Spatial treatments are interventions assigned to locations potentially distinct from those of the responding units. We study their optimal design under a general model in which a unit's response diminishes with distance to a treated site. Our estimand of interest is an ``uncontaminated'' effect equal to the average impact of a single intervention site over all hypothetical sites. We propose a novel design based on a Mat\'{e}rn point process which separates treatments by a distance of at least $r$. A larger choice of $r$ reduces bias by separating interventions but increases variance by reducing their numerosity. We choose $r$ to maximize the rate of convergence of a Horvitz-Thompson estimator and prove that this is minimax rate-optimal. We provide weak conditions under which the estimator is asymptotically normal and propose a variance estimator.

econ.EM