SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2511.22538

Bayesian Nonparametric Marked Hawkes Processes for Earthquake Modeling

Abstract

The Hawkes process is a versatile stochastic model for point patterns that exhibit self-excitation, that is, the property that an event occurrence increases the rate of occurrence for some period of time in the future. We present a Bayesian nonparametric modeling approach for temporal marked Hawkes processes. Our focus is on point process modeling of earthquake occurrences, where the mark variable is given by earthquake magnitude. We develop a nonparametric prior model for the marked Hawkes process excitation function, using a representation with basis components for the time lag and the mark, and basis weights defined through a gamma process prior. We elaborate the model with a nonparametric prior for time-dependent background intensity functions, thus enabling a fully nonparametric approach to modeling the ground process intensity of marked Hawkes processes. The model construction balances computationally tractable inference with flexible forms for marked Hawkes process functionals, including mark-dependent offspring densities. The posterior simulation method provides full inference, without any approximations to the Hawkes process likelihood. In the context of the application, the modeling approach enables estimation of aftershock densities that vary with the magnitude of the main shock, thus significantly expanding the inferential scope of existing self-exciting point process models for earthquake occurrences. We investigate different aspects of the methodology through study of model properties, and with inference results based on synthetic marked point patterns. The practical utility of modeling magnitude-dependent aftershock dynamics is demonstrated with analysis of earthquakes that occurred in Japan from 1885 through 1980.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Hyotae Kim, Athanasios Kottas. 2025-11-27. Bayesian Nonparametric Marked Hawkes Processes for Earthquake Modeling. https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.22538

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Surprise Reduction and Nullification in Bayesian and Inverse Bayesian Inference under Ambiguous Prediction-Error Attribution

In non-stationary environments, prediction errors may signal environmental change or transient outliers, and adaptive systems must track such changes without overreacting to outliers. We distinguish surprise reduction, which updates beliefs to fit observations, from surprise nullification, which weakens constraints imposed by the predictive structure, and formalize both within Bayesian and inverse Bayesian (BIB) inference. Belief and likelihood updates are derived from variational objectives sharing a nullification strength, determined endogenously by minimizing surprise under the candidate post-update predictive distribution. In the Gaussian case, nullification expands belief and likelihood variances by a common factor relative to standard Bayesian updating, leaving the ratio unchanged. BIB thus defers attribution of the prediction error, committing to neither latent-state change nor observation-process uncertainty. The nullification strength is carried over as a candidate and is maintained or released according to the predictive surprise of the next observation. In a mean estimation task with outliers and changepoints, no scanned parameter setting of a Sage-Husa-type adaptive Kalman filter, fixed-strength BIB variant, or belief-forgetting-only variant outperforms BIB in both changepoint tracking and post-outlier stability. An oracle-informed reduced Bayesian model tracks changepoints better but is less stable after outliers. Although BIB maintains no explicit hypotheses about changepoints or outliers, it generates event-dependent dynamics. The learning rate increases after changepoints, whereas after outliers, nullification is released, and this increase is suppressed. Deferring attribution and letting subsequent observations differentiate the responses may constitute a principle of adaptive inference in non-stationary environments.

stat.ME

Generalized Ridge Refitting for the Lasso and Prediction Improvement Bounds

We study a class of Lasso based estimators obtained by applying a quadratic correction on the Lasso equicorrelation set. The penalty matrix determines both the magnitude and geometry of the correction and contains, among other cases, the isotropic Lasso--Ridge correction, least squares refitting, Gram proportional interpolation between the Lasso and least squares, and coordinate specific penalties. We first derive a closed form representation and isolate the positive gain component of the resulting prediction improvement. We then control the remaining stochastic linear term in expectation by localizing the random signed equicorrelation model around a deterministic reference support. This yields a finite sample expectation bound that explicitly accounts for the randomness induced by Lasso model selection. The resulting decomposition provides a unified framework for understanding when Lasso based quadratic corrections can improve prediction.

stat.ME

Discretization in covariate-adaptive randomization: gains and losses

Covariate-adaptive randomization(CAR) is widely implemented in clinical trials to balance prognostic covariates across treatment arms. Continuous covariates are often discretized into strata in practice, yet their consequences are not clearly understood. This paper provides a comprehensive study of the impact of discretization on both the CAR design process and the inferential results thereafter. We establish the asymptotic properties of both imbalance measures and treatment effect estimators under discretized and non-discretized settings. Practical recommendations are given on when and how discretization should be employed. We show that discretization in design is generally recommended, as it enhances robustness against model misspecification. However, if the true model is known, the most efficient strategy is to balance covariates according to that model in the design. The theoretical results are corroborated by extensive simulation studies and an empirical application to a diabetes trial dataset. Together, the results clarify the gains and losses of discretization in CAR and pave the way for learning impact of discretization to other designs and beyond.

stat.ME