On Tight FPT Time Approximation Algorithms for k-Clustering Problems

Han Dai; Shi Li; Sijin Peng

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2512.04614

On Tight FPT Time Approximation Algorithms for k-Clustering Problems

Han Dai·Shi Li·Sijin Peng

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Following recent advances in combining approximation algorithms with fixed-parameter tractability (FPT), we study FPT-time approximation algorithms for minimum-norm $k$-clustering problems, parameterized by the number $k$ of open facilities. For the capacitated setting, we give a tight $(3+\epsilon)$-approximation for the general-norm capacitated $k$-clustering problem in FPT-time parameterized by $k$ and $\epsilon$. Prior to our work, such a result was only known for the capacitated $k$-median problem [CL, ICALP, 2019]. As a special case, our result yields an FPT-time $3$-approximation for capacitated $k$-center. The problem has not been studied in the FPT-time setting, with the previous best known polynomial-time approximation ratio being 9 [ABCG, MP, 2015]. In the uncapacitated setting, we consider the $top$-$cn$ norm $k$-clustering problem, where the goal of the problem is to minimize the $top$-$cn$ norm of the connection distance vector. Our main result is a tight $\big(1 + \frac 2{ec} + \epsilon\big)$-approximation algorithm for the problem with $c \in \big(\frac1e, 1\big]$. (For the case $c \leq \frac1e$, there is a simple tight $(3+\epsilon)$-approximation.) Our framework can be easily extended to give a tight $\left(3, 1+\frac2e + \epsilon\right)$-bicriteria approximation for the ($k$-center, $k$-median) problem in FPT time, improving the previous best polynomial-time $(4, 8)$ guarantee [AB, WAOA, 2017]. All results are based on a unified framework: computing a $(1+\epsilon)$-approximate solution using $O\left(\frac{k\log n}{\epsilon}\right)$ facilities $S$ via LP rounding, sampling a few client representatives $R$ based on the solution $S$, guessing a few pivots from $S \cup R$ and some radius information on the pivots, and solving the problem using the guesses. We believe this framework can lead to further results on $k$-clustering problems.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Han Dai, Shi Li, Sijin Peng. 2025-12-04. On Tight FPT Time Approximation Algorithms for k-Clustering Problems. https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.04614

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

A deterministic $(1+\varepsilon)^n$ approximation for the permanent of a nonnegative matrix

For every fixed $0<\varepsilon\le1$, we give a deterministic strongly polynomial algorithm that, given a nonnegative matrix $A\in\mathbb{R}_{\ge0}^{n\times n}$, returns $Q$ satisfying $\operatorname{per} A\le Q\le(1+\varepsilon)^n\operatorname{per} A$.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗