SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2512.14024

Fast Test Inversion for Resampling Methods

Abstract

Randomization-based inference commonly relies on grid search methods to construct confidence intervals by inverting hypothesis tests over a range of parameter values. While straightforward, this approach is computationally intensive and can yield conservative intervals due to discretization. We propose a novel method that exploits the algebraic structure of a broad class of test statistics--including those with variance estimators dependent on the null hypothesis--to produce exact confidence intervals efficiently. By expressing randomization statistics as rational functions of the parameter of interest, we analytically identify critical values where the test statistic's rank changes relative to the randomization distribution. This characterization allows us to derive the exact p-value curve and construct precise confidence intervals without exhaustive computation. For cases where the parameter of interest is a vector and a confidence region is needed, our method extends by calculating and storing the coefficients of the polynomial functions involved. This approach enables us to compute approximate p-value functions and confidence regions more efficiently than traditional grid search methods, as we avoid recalculating test statistics from scratch for each parameter value. We illustrate our method using tests from Pouliot (2024) and extend it to other randomization tests, such as those developed by DiCiccio and Romano (2017) and D'Haultf{\oe}uille and Tuvaandorj (2024). Our approach significantly reduces computational burden and overcomes the limitations of traditional grid search methods, providing a practical and efficient solution for confidence interval and region construction in randomization-based inference.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Ian Xu. 2025-12-16. Fast Test Inversion for Resampling Methods. https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.14024

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Identification in Linear Quantile Panel Models

This paper studies identification in linear quantile panel models with unrestricted individual heterogeneity when the number of time periods is fixed and small. We impose strict exogeneity, whereby the conditional quantile restriction holds given the individual's complete regressor history and latent individual effect, but otherwise allow the disturbances to be arbitrarily dependent over time.

econ.EM

Experimental Design for Policy Choice

We show how to optimally design experiments when the resulting data will be used to choose a welfare-maximizing policy subject to constraints. A decision maker seeks to maximize Bayes expected welfare by choosing a policy whose effects depend on an unknown finite-dimensional parameter. The decision maker has access to a first wave of experimental data with a fixed design but may choose the design of a second wave that will be collected before choosing the policy. The resulting experimental design--policy choice problem is a very high-dimensional dynamic program that is generally intractable in finite samples. We propose a tractable approximation based on the limit experiment and show it is asymptotically optimal using a new asymptotic representation theorem for adaptive experiments with continuous treatments. We apply the method to a conditional cash transfer experiment and demonstrate the potential for large gains from tailoring the experiment to the policy choice.

econ.EM

Designing Spatial Treatments

Spatial treatments are interventions assigned to locations potentially distinct from those of the responding units. We study their optimal design under a general model in which a unit's response diminishes with distance to a treated site. Our estimand of interest is an ``uncontaminated'' effect equal to the average impact of a single intervention site over all hypothetical sites. We propose a novel design based on a Mat\'{e}rn point process which separates treatments by a distance of at least $r$. A larger choice of $r$ reduces bias by separating interventions but increases variance by reducing their numerosity. We choose $r$ to maximize the rate of convergence of a Horvitz-Thompson estimator and prove that this is minimax rate-optimal. We provide weak conditions under which the estimator is asymptotically normal and propose a variance estimator.

econ.EM