Exploring Logistic Functions as Robust Alternatives to Hill Functions in Genetic Network Modeling

Abstract

Hill functions dominate gene regulatory network (GRN) modeling, but their fractional exponents create analytical pathologies when the Hill coefficient $n$ is non-integer -- a ubiquitous occurrence in experimental fits. We replace the Hill activation $h^+(x,\theta,n)=x^n/(x^n+\theta^n)$ and repression $h^-(x,\theta,n)=\theta^n/(x^n+\theta^n)$ with the logistic counterparts $f^+(x,\theta,\lambda)=1/(1+e^{-\lambda(x-\theta)})$ and $f^-(x,\theta,\lambda)=1/(1+e^{\lambda(x-\theta)})$. The matching $\lambda=n/\theta$ preserves the slope at the half-maximal concentration. Four families of Hill pathologies appear for non-integer $n$: derivative singularities at the origin ($h^{+\prime}(x)\to\infty$ as $x\to 0^+$ for $0 0$. We prove the product-of-logistics GRN model admits globally unique, smooth, uniformly bounded solutions with explicit Lipschitz constant $L_F\le M=\max_i(\kappa_i\sum_j L_i^j+\gamma_i)$. The identity $h^+(x,\theta,n)=\sigma(n\ln(x/\theta))$ shows the Hill is a logistic of the log-ratio, but the change of variable $s=\ln(x/\theta)$ introduces a state-dependent factor $e^{-s}$ on the production side, so the two ODE models are nonequivalent. They encode different hypotheses -- multiplicative-increment versus additive-threshold sensitivity -- and the structural advantages of the logistic framework hold under either.