SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2512.17496

Inference on state occupancy in covariate-driven hidden Markov models

Abstract

Hidden Markov models (HMMs) are popular tools for analysing animal behaviour based on movement, acceleration and other sensor data. In particular, these models allow to infer how the animal's decision-making process interacts with internal and external drivers, by relating the probabilities of switching between distinct behavioural states to covariates. A key challenge arising in the statistical analysis of behavioural data using covariate-driven HMMs is the models' interpretation, especially when there are more than two states, as then several functional relationships between state-switching probabilities and covariates need to be jointly interpreted. The model-implied probabilities of occupying the different states, as a function of a covariate of interest, constitute a much simpler summary statistic. A pragmatic approximation of the state occupancy distribution, namely the hypothetical stationary distribution of the model's underlying Markov chain for fixed covariate values, has in fact routinely been reported in HMM-based analyses of ecological data. However, for stochastically varying covariates with relatively little persistence, we show that this approximation can be severely biased, potentially invalidating ecological inference. We develop two alternative approaches for obtaining the state occupancy distribution as a function of a covariate of interest - one based on resampling of the covariate process, the other obtained by regression analysis of the empirical state probabilities. The practical application of these approaches is demonstrated in simulations and a case study on Gal\'apagos tortoise (Chelonoidis niger) movement data. Our methods enable practitioners to conduct unbiased inference on the relationship between animal behaviour and general types of covariates, thus allowing to uncover the factors influencing behavioural decisions made by animals.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Maya N. Vienken, Jan-Ole Koslik, Roland Langrock. 2025-12-19. Inference on state occupancy in covariate-driven hidden Markov models. https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.17496

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Surprise Reduction and Nullification in Bayesian and Inverse Bayesian Inference under Ambiguous Prediction-Error Attribution

In non-stationary environments, prediction errors may signal environmental change or transient outliers, and adaptive systems must track such changes without overreacting to outliers. We distinguish surprise reduction, which updates beliefs to fit observations, from surprise nullification, which weakens constraints imposed by the predictive structure, and formalize both within Bayesian and inverse Bayesian (BIB) inference. Belief and likelihood updates are derived from variational objectives sharing a nullification strength, determined endogenously by minimizing surprise under the candidate post-update predictive distribution. In the Gaussian case, nullification expands belief and likelihood variances by a common factor relative to standard Bayesian updating, leaving the ratio unchanged. BIB thus defers attribution of the prediction error, committing to neither latent-state change nor observation-process uncertainty. The nullification strength is carried over as a candidate and is maintained or released according to the predictive surprise of the next observation. In a mean estimation task with outliers and changepoints, no scanned parameter setting of a Sage-Husa-type adaptive Kalman filter, fixed-strength BIB variant, or belief-forgetting-only variant outperforms BIB in both changepoint tracking and post-outlier stability. An oracle-informed reduced Bayesian model tracks changepoints better but is less stable after outliers. Although BIB maintains no explicit hypotheses about changepoints or outliers, it generates event-dependent dynamics. The learning rate increases after changepoints, whereas after outliers, nullification is released, and this increase is suppressed. Deferring attribution and letting subsequent observations differentiate the responses may constitute a principle of adaptive inference in non-stationary environments.

stat.ME

Generalized Ridge Refitting for the Lasso and Prediction Improvement Bounds

We study a class of Lasso based estimators obtained by applying a quadratic correction on the Lasso equicorrelation set. The penalty matrix determines both the magnitude and geometry of the correction and contains, among other cases, the isotropic Lasso--Ridge correction, least squares refitting, Gram proportional interpolation between the Lasso and least squares, and coordinate specific penalties. We first derive a closed form representation and isolate the positive gain component of the resulting prediction improvement. We then control the remaining stochastic linear term in expectation by localizing the random signed equicorrelation model around a deterministic reference support. This yields a finite sample expectation bound that explicitly accounts for the randomness induced by Lasso model selection. The resulting decomposition provides a unified framework for understanding when Lasso based quadratic corrections can improve prediction.

stat.ME

Discretization in covariate-adaptive randomization: gains and losses

Covariate-adaptive randomization(CAR) is widely implemented in clinical trials to balance prognostic covariates across treatment arms. Continuous covariates are often discretized into strata in practice, yet their consequences are not clearly understood. This paper provides a comprehensive study of the impact of discretization on both the CAR design process and the inferential results thereafter. We establish the asymptotic properties of both imbalance measures and treatment effect estimators under discretized and non-discretized settings. Practical recommendations are given on when and how discretization should be employed. We show that discretization in design is generally recommended, as it enhances robustness against model misspecification. However, if the true model is known, the most efficient strategy is to balance covariates according to that model in the design. The theoretical results are corroborated by extensive simulation studies and an empirical application to a diabetes trial dataset. Together, the results clarify the gains and losses of discretization in CAR and pave the way for learning impact of discretization to other designs and beyond.

stat.ME