SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2512.19824

Regret in Treatment Choice when Welfare Varies with an Uncertain Event: The Prediction-Threshold Problem

Abstract

We study maximum regret (MR) of binary treatment choice in a population with observed covariates x, when welfare varies with an uncertain binary event. We consider decision making with plug-in probabilistic predictions of the event and pre-specified decision thresholds, which we term the prediction-threshold problem. The optimal treatment for persons with covariate value x is B if the conditional probability P(y=1|x) of a binary outcome y exceeds a particular x-specific threshold and is A otherwise. This structure is common in medical decision making and other contexts. Plug-in prediction uses data to estimate P(y|x) and acts as if the estimate is accurate. However, plug-in prediction is often performed with misspecified prediction models and conventional x-invariant thresholds. We use a combination of algebraic and computational analysis of limit and finite-sample MR to demonstrate how MR depends on the prediction model, the state space, and the thresholds used to choose treatments.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Jeff Dominitz, Charles F. Manski. 2025-12-22. Regret in Treatment Choice when Welfare Varies with an Uncertain Event: The Prediction-Threshold Problem. https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.19824

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Identification in Linear Quantile Panel Models

This paper studies identification in linear quantile panel models with unrestricted individual heterogeneity when the number of time periods is fixed and small. We impose strict exogeneity, whereby the conditional quantile restriction holds given the individual's complete regressor history and latent individual effect, but otherwise allow the disturbances to be arbitrarily dependent over time.

econ.EM

Experimental Design for Policy Choice

We show how to optimally design experiments when the resulting data will be used to choose a welfare-maximizing policy subject to constraints. A decision maker seeks to maximize Bayes expected welfare by choosing a policy whose effects depend on an unknown finite-dimensional parameter. The decision maker has access to a first wave of experimental data with a fixed design but may choose the design of a second wave that will be collected before choosing the policy. The resulting experimental design--policy choice problem is a very high-dimensional dynamic program that is generally intractable in finite samples. We propose a tractable approximation based on the limit experiment and show it is asymptotically optimal using a new asymptotic representation theorem for adaptive experiments with continuous treatments. We apply the method to a conditional cash transfer experiment and demonstrate the potential for large gains from tailoring the experiment to the policy choice.

econ.EM

Designing Spatial Treatments

Spatial treatments are interventions assigned to locations potentially distinct from those of the responding units. We study their optimal design under a general model in which a unit's response diminishes with distance to a treated site. Our estimand of interest is an ``uncontaminated'' effect equal to the average impact of a single intervention site over all hypothetical sites. We propose a novel design based on a Mat\'{e}rn point process which separates treatments by a distance of at least $r$. A larger choice of $r$ reduces bias by separating interventions but increases variance by reducing their numerosity. We choose $r$ to maximize the rate of convergence of a Horvitz-Thompson estimator and prove that this is minimax rate-optimal. We provide weak conditions under which the estimator is asymptotically normal and propose a variance estimator.

econ.EM