SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2512.22327

Hawksmoor's Ceiling, Mercator's Projection and the Roman Pantheon

Abstract

The dome of the Roman Pantheon is coffered with ribs surrounding sunken lacunaria, thus forming a grid. How this is achieved given the curvature of the dome has long been a subject for study and speculation. Although detailed measurements now exist, thus far no single principle has emerged which fixes the overall geometry. Similar coffering occurs in Hawksmoor's design for the ceiling of the Buttery in All Souls College, Oxford. Both these examples are doubly curved, making their tiling with (almost) square coffers problematic. We address this using methods of differential geometry. Observing that the ribs intersect orthogonally, we hypothesize that they are images under a conformal (angle preserving) mapping of a uniform M x N tiling of a planar rectangle with squares. This is unique and is the inverse of Mercator's projection of the ceiling to the rectangle. It minimizes an energy functional which captures the sum of the elastic and gravitational energies in the long wavelength limit. Thus, any construction method which is stable to long wavelength deformations necessarily leads to a conformal coffering. This then gives quantitative predictions with no adjustable parameters for the relative sizes and locations of each coffer, which are in good agreement with photographic data, and consistent with direct measurements of the Pantheon. We suggest protocols by which Hawksmoor's ceiling and the Pantheon might have been constructed without advanced mathematics.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

John Cardy. 2025-12-26. Hawksmoor's Ceiling, Mercator's Projection and the Roman Pantheon. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2026.0076

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Perspectives on the unit distance problem

This is a survey on an old open problem in combinatorics called the unit distance problem, and the field of mathematics around it, called incidence geometry. What do we know about the problem? Why is it difficult? How does it connect with other parts of math?

math.HO

A Categorical Approach to Euclidean Ratios and Proportions

A categorial approach to the non-metric geometry in Books V and VI of Euclid's \textit{Elements} is presented. Specifically, we introduce a diagrammatic syntax that can be overlaid immediately on his diagrams, thus bridging intuitive presentation with fidelity to Euclid's arguments. This syntax makes complicated definitions like V.5, and indeed the arguments throughout books V and VI, including arguments about similar figures, intuitively clear. We show in an appendix that this syntax can be used to solve a puzzle regarding ancient mathematics. Finally, we offer evidence that this approach to Euclidean diagrams is rooted in the Aristotelian tradition itself, and that a similar syntax was utilized, in antiquity, for related questions of numeric and proportions. Thus the syntax is plausibly faithful to Euclid's own thought-world, and not an outside-imposition.

math.HO

Some Early Results by Tutte Regarding the Cycle Double Cover Conjecture in 1948

OpenAI recently announced a proof of the Cycle Double Cover (CDC) Conjecture. Most media reports have characterized it as a 50-year-old open problem. In reality, according to a 1987 letter from Tutte to Fleischner, the Cycle Double Cover Problem has been open for at least 80 years. Two early results regarding the CDC conjecture were established in one of Tutte's 1949 publications.

math.HO