SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2601.02008

XAI-MeD: Explainable Knowledge Guided Neuro-Symbolic Framework for Domain Generalization and Rare Class Detection in Medical Imaging

Abstract

Explainability domain generalization and rare class reliability are critical challenges in medical AI where deep models often fail under real world distribution shifts and exhibit bias against infrequent clinical conditions This paper introduces XAIMeD an explainable medical AI framework that integrates clinically accurate expert knowledge into deep learning through a unified neuro symbolic architecture XAIMeD is designed to improve robustness under distribution shift enhance rare class sensitivity and deliver transparent clinically aligned interpretations The framework encodes clinical expertise as logical connectives over atomic medical propositions transforming them into machine checkable class specific rules Their diagnostic utility is quantified through weighted feature satisfaction scores enabling a symbolic reasoning branch that complements neural predictions A confidence weighted fusion integrates symbolic and deep outputs while a Hunt inspired adaptive routing mechanism guided by Entropy Imbalance Gain EIG and Rare Class Gini mitigates class imbalance high intra class variability and uncertainty We evaluate XAIMeD across diverse modalities on four challenging tasks i Seizure Onset Zone SOZ localization from rs fMRI ii Diabetic Retinopathy grading across 6 multicenter datasets demonstrate substantial performance improvements including 6 percent gains in cross domain generalization and a 10 percent improved rare class F1 score far outperforming state of the art deep learning baselines Ablation studies confirm that the clinically grounded symbolic components act as effective regularizers ensuring robustness to distribution shifts XAIMeD thus provides a principled clinically faithful and interpretable approach to multimodal medical AI.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Midhat Urooj, Ayan Banerjee, Sandeep Gupta. 2026-01-05. XAI-MeD: Explainable Knowledge Guided Neuro-Symbolic Framework for Domain Generalization and Rare Class Detection in Medical Imaging. https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.02008

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Decoupling Readiness from Release for Tail-Aware Scheduling of Agentic LLM Workflows

Agentic LLM workflows consist of sequences of model turns interleaved with tool interactions, so their end-to-end completion time depends not only on inference speed but also on when ready turns are released. Most runtimes release each turn immediately upon readiness. Under contention, this eager release policy can accumulate released but unfinished work; once submitted, those turns can no longer be reordered by the workflow-level policy, increasing tail latency. We present a tail-risk-aware turn release scheduling method that jointly decides which ready turn to release next and how much released but unfinished work to maintain. The method uses a mean--Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR) objective to capture the evolving tail risk of unfinished workflows, incorporates online estimates of turn work when prioritizing ready turns, and adapts the released work budget to observed queue pressure. We evaluate the method using real agent execution traces from software engineering tasks across multiple LLMs and workflow arrival rates. The method performs comparably to eager release under light load and substantially reduces the P95 of workflow flow time under contention, achieving up to a \(3.50\times\) speedup.

cs.AI

Demystifying the Privacy-Utility Trade-off in LLM Interactions

The integration of Large Language Models into daily tasks relies on context-rich instructions, inevitably exposing sensitive user information. Current privacy-preserving methods typically employ context-agnostic static rules, causing severe utility degradation. However, the specific mechanisms governing how sanitization impacts downstream performance remain largely underexplored. To address this, we conduct a systematic analysis to deconstruct the privacy-utility trade-off, uncovering three underlying mechanisms: (1) Context-Dependent Utility, which first establishes when to sanitize by revealing that data value shifts from critical constraints to dispensable noise based on user intent; (2) Strategic Adaptation, which subsequently determines how to sanitize by dictating that the choice between removal and replacement depends on the task's reliance on factual integrity versus structural coherence; and (3) Combinatorial Interplay, which finally extends the protection scope by demonstrating that attributes form a semantic web of synergistic dependencies or antagonistic redundancies. Guided by these insights, we introduce an intent-driven local protection framework. By distilling a lightweight model Veilmind-4B to drive a dynamic extraction-sanitization-restoration pipeline, our approach reaches a low-leakage privacy point while preserving substantially higher response utility than existing privacy-oriented baselines, advancing the privacy-utility trade-off toward the Pareto frontier.

cs.AI

Defining AI Agents: A Compendium of Criteria, Metrics, and Benchmarks

The term agent in artificial intelligence lacks a standard definition, complicating the evaluation, comparison, and reproducibility of AI agent research. We address this ambiguity through a survey organized around five dimensions of agenticness: environmental interaction, learning and adaptation, autonomy, goal-directed behavior, and temporal coherence. For each dimension, we examine how the underlying capability has been conceptualized across prior work and synthesize the metrics, benchmarks, and evaluation frameworks used to assess it. This review provides a structured account of the current landscape of agent evaluation, highlighting both established approaches and areas where evaluation remains limited or inconsistent. We additionally introduce the Agent Compendium, a public-facing digital resource that organizes and extends the evaluation methods identified through this review. Together, the survey and compendium provide a common structure for evaluating and comparing agent capabilities across AI systems, supporting more reproducible research, clearer communication, and more systematic study of artificial agents.

cs.AI