SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2601.03155

Vaught's Conjecture and Theories of Partial Order Admitting a Finite Lexicographic Decomposition

Abstract

A complete theory ${\mathcal T}$ of partial order is an FLD$_1$-theory iff some (equivalently, any) of its models ${\mathbb X}$ admits a finite lexicographic decomposition ${\mathbb X} =\sum _{{\mathbb I}}{\mathbb X} _i$, where ${\mathbb I}$ is a finite partial order and ${\mathbb X} _i$-s are partial orders with a largest element. Then we write $\sum _{{\mathbb I}}{\mathbb X}_i\in {\mathcal D} ({\mathcal T})$ and call $\sum _{{\mathbb I}}{\mathbb X}_i$ a VC-decomposition (resp. a VC$^\sharp$-decomposition} iff ${\mathbb X} _i$ satisfies Vaught's conjecture (VC) (resp. VC$^\sharp$: $I({\mathbb X} _i)\in \{ 1,{\mathfrak{c}}\}$), for each $i\in I$. ${\mathcal T}$ is called actually Vaught's iff for some $\sum _{{\mathbb I}}{\mathbb X}_i\in {\mathcal D} ({\mathcal T})$ there are sentences $\tau _i\in \mathop{\rm Th}\nolimits ({\mathbb X} _i)$, $i\in I$, providing VC. We prove that: (1) VC is true for ${\mathcal T}$ iff ${\mathcal T}$ is large or its atomic model has a VC decomposition; (2) VC is true for each actually Vaught's FLD$_1$ theory; (3) VC$^\sharp$ is true for ${\mathcal T}$, if there is a VC$^\sharp$-decomposition of a model of ${\mathcal T}$. VC is true for the partial orders from the closure $\langle {\mathcal C} ^{\rm reticle}_0\cup {\mathcal C} ^{\rm ba}\rangle _{\Sigma}$, where $\langle {\mathcal C}\rangle _{\Sigma}$ denotes the closure of a class ${\mathcal C}$ under finite lexicographic sums. VC$^{\sharp}$ is true for a large class of partial orders of the form $\sum _{{\mathbb I}}(\dot{\bigcup}_{j<n_i}\prod _{k<m_i^j}{\mathbb X} _i^{j,k})_r$, where ${\mathbb X} _i^{j,k}$-s can be linear orders, or Boolean algebras, or belong to a wide class of trees.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Miloš S. Kurilić. 2026-01-06. Vaught's Conjecture and Theories of Partial Order Admitting a Finite Lexicographic Decomposition. https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.03155

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

There is no maximal $K$-degree

The Kolmogorov complexity of a string characterize how complex it is to describe the string. If every prefix of a real $x$ is more complex to describe than every prefix (of the same length) of real $y$, then it is seen as $x$ is more complex to describe than $y$. It is wondered if there is a real $x$ so that no other reals are strictly more complex (to describe) than $x$. The behavior of Kolmogorov complexity functions generated by reals (namely $n\mapsto$ the minimal description length of the real) is quite chaos. Therefore, it is widely believed that there are many reals that are maximally complex to describe. For instance, it is conjectured that all random enough reals have maximal $K$-degree. In this paper, it is shown that there is no real with maximal $K$-degree. Actually, for almost all real $x$, we can uniformly computably find another real whose $K$-degree is strictly above $x$.

math.LO

Quadruples and cubes

We prove, in $\mathsf{ZFC}$, that the $\lambda$-terraced cube relation fails whenever $\lambda$ is an uncountable cardinal. The corresponding terraced relation for quadruples fails for every $\lambda$. If $\lambda$ is $\aleph_0$ then the pretinent terraced relation has consistency strength of at least one Woodin cardinal. We prove positive polarized relations at a successor and a double successor from wondrous ideals. We show, however, that there are no such ideals over two consecutive cardinals simultaneously.

math.LO

Possibilistic Logic over a Logic of Formal Inconsistency

In this article, we have introduced a new possibilistic logic on a logic of formal inconsistency with the aim of developing a possibility theoretic framework to deal with uncertainty and inconsistency meaningfully without leading to a system collapse. We have discussed the syntax and semantics for this logic and have proved the soundness and completeness theorems. A set of new measures of consistency, contradictoriness, and triviality of a set of formulas have been defined. These have then been put to use in an example to show that this framework can provide better means of machine reasoning.

math.LO