SCORE: A Unified Framework for Overshoot Refund in Online FDR Control

Qi Kuang; Bowen Gang; Yin Xia

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2601.20386

SCORE: A Unified Framework for Overshoot Refund in Online FDR Control

Qi Kuang·Bowen Gang·Yin Xia

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We propose a unified framework to enhance the power of online multiple hypothesis testing procedures based on $e$-values. While $e$-value-based methods offer robust online False Discovery Rate (FDR) control under minimal assumptions, they often suffer from power loss by discarding evidence that exceeds the rejection threshold. We address this inefficiency via the Sequential Control with Overshoot Refund for E-values (SCORE) framework, which leverages the inequality $\mathbb{I}(y \ge 1) \le y - (y-1)_+$, valid for all $y\ge 0$, to reclaim this otherwise wasted evidence. This simple yet powerful insight yields a unified principle for improving a broad class of online testing algorithms. Building on this framework, we develop SCORE-enhanced versions of several state-of-the-art procedures, including SCORE-LOND, SCORE-LORD, and SCORE-SAFFRON, all of which strictly dominate their original counterparts while preserving valid finite-sample FDR control. Furthermore, under mild assumptions, SCORE permits retroactive updates of alpha-wealth by using the latest decision twice: first to determine its reward or loss, and then to refresh past wealth. Such a mechanism enables more aggressive testing strategies while maintaining valid FDR control, thereby further improving statistical power. The effectiveness of the proposed methods is validated through extensive simulation and real-data experiments.

Explore related subjects

stat.ME

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Qi Kuang, Bowen Gang, Yin Xia. 2026-01-28. SCORE: A Unified Framework for Overshoot Refund in Online FDR Control. https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.20386

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Surprise Reduction and Nullification in Bayesian and Inverse Bayesian Inference under Ambiguous Prediction-Error Attribution

In non-stationary environments, prediction errors may signal environmental change or transient outliers, and adaptive systems must track such changes without overreacting to outliers. We distinguish surprise reduction, which updates beliefs to fit observations, from surprise nullification, which weakens constraints imposed by the predictive structure, and formalize both within Bayesian and inverse Bayesian (BIB) inference. Belief and likelihood updates are derived from variational objectives sharing a nullification strength, determined endogenously by minimizing surprise under the candidate post-update predictive distribution. In the Gaussian case, nullification expands belief and likelihood variances by a common factor relative to standard Bayesian updating, leaving the ratio unchanged. BIB thus defers attribution of the prediction error, committing to neither latent-state change nor observation-process uncertainty. The nullification strength is carried over as a candidate and is maintained or released according to the predictive surprise of the next observation. In a mean estimation task with outliers and changepoints, no scanned parameter setting of a Sage-Husa-type adaptive Kalman filter, fixed-strength BIB variant, or belief-forgetting-only variant outperforms BIB in both changepoint tracking and post-outlier stability. An oracle-informed reduced Bayesian model tracks changepoints better but is less stable after outliers. Although BIB maintains no explicit hypotheses about changepoints or outliers, it generates event-dependent dynamics. The learning rate increases after changepoints, whereas after outliers, nullification is released, and this increase is suppressed. Deferring attribution and letting subsequent observations differentiate the responses may constitute a principle of adaptive inference in non-stationary environments.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2026

Generalized Ridge Refitting for the Lasso and Prediction Improvement Bounds

We study a class of Lasso based estimators obtained by applying a quadratic correction on the Lasso equicorrelation set. The penalty matrix determines both the magnitude and geometry of the correction and contains, among other cases, the isotropic Lasso--Ridge correction, least squares refitting, Gram proportional interpolation between the Lasso and least squares, and coordinate specific penalties. We first derive a closed form representation and isolate the positive gain component of the resulting prediction improvement. We then control the remaining stochastic linear term in expectation by localizing the random signed equicorrelation model around a deterministic reference support. This yields a finite sample expectation bound that explicitly accounts for the randomness induced by Lasso model selection. The resulting decomposition provides a unified framework for understanding when Lasso based quadratic corrections can improve prediction.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2026

Discretization in covariate-adaptive randomization: gains and losses

Covariate-adaptive randomization(CAR) is widely implemented in clinical trials to balance prognostic covariates across treatment arms. Continuous covariates are often discretized into strata in practice, yet their consequences are not clearly understood. This paper provides a comprehensive study of the impact of discretization on both the CAR design process and the inferential results thereafter. We establish the asymptotic properties of both imbalance measures and treatment effect estimators under discretized and non-discretized settings. Practical recommendations are given on when and how discretization should be employed. We show that discretization in design is generally recommended, as it enhances robustness against model misspecification. However, if the true model is known, the most efficient strategy is to balance covariates according to that model in the design. The theoretical results are corroborated by extensive simulation studies and an empirical application to a diabetes trial dataset. Together, the results clarify the gains and losses of discretization in CAR and pave the way for learning impact of discretization to other designs and beyond.

stat.ME↗