Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2601.21457

When Local and Non-Local Meet: Quadratic Improvement for Edge Estimation with Independent Set Queries

Tomer Adar·Yahel Hotam·Amit Levi
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We study the problem of estimating the number of edges in an unknown graph. We consider a hybrid model in which an algorithm may issue independent set, degree, and neighbor queries. We show that this model admits strictly more efficient edge estimation than either access type alone. Specifically, we give a randomized algorithm that outputs a $(1\pm\varepsilon)$-approximation of the number of edges using $O\left(\min\left(\sqrt{m}, \sqrt{\frac{n}{\sqrt{m}}}\right)\cdot\frac{\log n}{\varepsilon^{5/2}}\right)$ queries, and prove a nearly matching lower bound. In contrast, prior work shows that in the local query model (Goldreich and Ron, \textit{Random Structures \& Algorithms} 2008) and in the independent set query model (Beame \emph{et al.} ITCS 2018, Chen \emph{et al.} SODA 2020), edge estimation requires $\widetilde{\Theta}(n/\sqrt{m})$ queries in the same parameter regimes. Our results therefore yield a quadratic improvement in the hybrid model, and no asymptotically better improvement is possible.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Tomer Adar, Yahel Hotam, Amit Levi. 2026-01-29. When Local and Non-Local Meet: Quadratic Improvement for Edge Estimation with Independent Set Queries. https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.21457

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗