arXiv · 2602.04939
SynthForensics: Benchmarking and Evaluating People-Centric Synthetic Video Deepfakes
Abstract
Modern T2V/I2V generators synthesize people increasingly hard to distinguish from authentic footage, while current evaluation suites lag: legacy benchmarks target manipulation-based forgeries, and recent synthetic-video benchmarks prioritize scale over realistic human depiction. We introduce SynthForensics, a people-centric benchmark of $20{,}445$ videos from 8 T2V and 7 I2V open-source generators, paired-source from FF++/DFD reals, two-stage human-validated, in four compression versions with full metadata. In our paired-comparison human study, raters prefer SynthForensics in $71$--$77\%$ of head-to-head comparisons against each of nine existing synthetic-video benchmarks, while facial-quality metrics fall within the FF++/DFD baseline range. Across 15 detectors and three protocols, face-based methods drop $13$--$55$ AUC points (mean $27$) from FF++ to SynthForensics and a further $23$ under aggressive compression; fine-tuning closes the gap at a backward cost on legacy benchmarks; training from scratch shows synthetic and manipulation features largely disjoint for most detectors. We release dataset, pipeline, and code.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Roberto Leotta, Salvatore Alfio Sambataro, Claudio Vittorio Ragaglia, Mirko Casu, Yuri Petralia, Francesco Guarnera, Luca Guarnera, Sebastiano Battiato. 2026-02-04. SynthForensics: Benchmarking and Evaluating People-Centric Synthetic Video Deepfakes. https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.04939
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.