SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2602.05099

Personalized Policy Learning through Discrete Experimentation: Theory and Empirical Evidence

Abstract

Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs), or A/B testing, have become the gold standard for optimizing various operational policies on online platforms. However, RCTs on these platforms typically cover a limited number of discrete treatment levels, while the platforms increasingly face complex operational challenges involving optimizing continuous variables, such as pricing and incentive programs. The current industry practice involves discretizing these continuous decision variables into several treatment levels and selecting the optimal discrete treatment level. This approach, however, often leads to suboptimal decisions as it cannot accurately extrapolate performance for untested treatment levels and fails to account for heterogeneity in treatment effects across user characteristics. This study addresses these limitations by developing a theoretically solid and empirically verified framework to learn personalized continuous policies based on high-dimensional user characteristics, using observations from an RCT with only a discrete set of treatment levels. Specifically, we introduce a deep learning for policy targeting (DLPT) framework that includes both personalized policy value estimation and personalized policy learning. We prove that our policy value estimators are asymptotically unbiased and consistent, and the learned policy achieves a root-n-regret bound. We empirically validate our methods in collaboration with a leading social media platform to optimize incentive levels for content creation. Results demonstrate that our DLPT framework significantly outperforms existing benchmarks, achieving substantial improvements in both evaluating the value of policies for each user group and identifying the optimal personalized policy.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Zhiqi Zhang, Zhiyu Zeng, Ruohan Zhan, Dennis Zhang. 2026-02-04. Personalized Policy Learning through Discrete Experimentation: Theory and Empirical Evidence. https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.05099

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Identification in Linear Quantile Panel Models

This paper studies identification in linear quantile panel models with unrestricted individual heterogeneity when the number of time periods is fixed and small. We impose strict exogeneity, whereby the conditional quantile restriction holds given the individual's complete regressor history and latent individual effect, but otherwise allow the disturbances to be arbitrarily dependent over time.

econ.EM

Experimental Design for Policy Choice

We show how to optimally design experiments when the resulting data will be used to choose a welfare-maximizing policy subject to constraints. A decision maker seeks to maximize Bayes expected welfare by choosing a policy whose effects depend on an unknown finite-dimensional parameter. The decision maker has access to a first wave of experimental data with a fixed design but may choose the design of a second wave that will be collected before choosing the policy. The resulting experimental design--policy choice problem is a very high-dimensional dynamic program that is generally intractable in finite samples. We propose a tractable approximation based on the limit experiment and show it is asymptotically optimal using a new asymptotic representation theorem for adaptive experiments with continuous treatments. We apply the method to a conditional cash transfer experiment and demonstrate the potential for large gains from tailoring the experiment to the policy choice.

econ.EM

Designing Spatial Treatments

Spatial treatments are interventions assigned to locations potentially distinct from those of the responding units. We study their optimal design under a general model in which a unit's response diminishes with distance to a treated site. Our estimand of interest is an ``uncontaminated'' effect equal to the average impact of a single intervention site over all hypothetical sites. We propose a novel design based on a Mat\'{e}rn point process which separates treatments by a distance of at least $r$. A larger choice of $r$ reduces bias by separating interventions but increases variance by reducing their numerosity. We choose $r$ to maximize the rate of convergence of a Horvitz-Thompson estimator and prove that this is minimax rate-optimal. We provide weak conditions under which the estimator is asymptotically normal and propose a variance estimator.

econ.EM