SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2602.05765

RL-VLA$^3$: A Flexible and Asynchronous Reinforcement Learning Framework for VLA Training

Abstract

Reinforcement learning (RL) has emerged as a critical paradigm for post-training Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models, enabling embodied agents to adapt and improve through environmental interaction. However, existing RL frameworks for VLAs inherit synchronous design principles from traditional LLM training, treating entire rollouts as indivisible units and alternating strictly between data collection and policy optimization. This fundamentally mismatches the unique characteristics of VLA training, as physical simulators introduce highly variable, resource-intensive latencies. To address this, we introduce RL-VLA$^3$, a fully asynchronous distributed RL framework that enables fine-grained asynchronous interaction between simulation, inference, and training components through dynamic batching schedulers and flexible environment sharding strategies. Extensive experiments across diverse simulation backends, VLA architectures, and RL algorithms demonstrate that RL-VLA$^3$ achieves throughput improvements of up to 85.2\% over synchronous baselines while maintaining identical sample efficiency, with scalability validated from 8 to 256 GPUs. To our knowledge, RL-VLA$^3$ is the first fully asynchronous RL training framework tailored specifically for the system-level challenges of VLA training.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Haoran Sun, Yongjian Guo, Zhong Guan, Shuai Di, Xiaodong Bai, Jing Long, Tianyun Zhao, Mingxi Luo, Hongke Zhao, Likang Wu, Xiaotie Deng, Xu Chu, Xi Xiao, Sheng Wen, Yicheng Gong, Junwu Xiong. 2026-09-04. RL-VLA$^3$: A Flexible and Asynchronous Reinforcement Learning Framework for VLA Training. https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.05765

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

Discover connections

Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Reducing Catastrophic Risk from AI with Systematic Monitoring and Evaluation of Rogue AI Progression

This article presents a structured framework of behavioral indicators that may signal progression toward potentially catastrophic threats from artificial intelligence systems. We adopt a pragmatic approach, inspired by established methodologies in cybersecurity and national security. By establishing clear metrics, indicators, and thresholds across multiple dimensions of AI capability and behavior, this framework enables researchers and policymakers to implement evidence-based monitoring protocols.

cs.CY

Impact of AI Search Summaries on Website Traffic: Evidence from Google AI Overviews and Wikipedia

Search engines increasingly display AI-generated answers above organic links, potentially displacing traffic to upstream publishers. We estimate the impact of Google's AI Overviews (AIO) on Wikipedia's search traffic using AIO's staggered geographic rollout and Wikipedia's multilingual structure. Our difference-in-differences design compares monthly external-search referrals to English Wikipedia articles with referrals to the same articles in German and French, and finds that default AIO availability reduced English search traffic by 5.45% and 4.82%, respectively. Our results suggest that answer-producing digital intermediaries can materially reallocate attention away from informational publishers, with implications for content monetization, search platform design, and policy.

cs.CY

The End of AI Exponentiation: Fluttering Inside and Outside AI Bubble

The exponentiation of Artificial intelligence (AI) in the recent past has entered a transformative era that has been driven by the growth in large language models (LLMs), large-scale compute infrastructures, and autonomous reasoning systems. However, the rapid acceleration of AI has increasingly shown technological, societal, economic, ethical and infrastructural challenges associated with peak data limitations, rising computational demands, synthetic data recursion, valuation inflation, and societal instability. The traditional scaling paradigms that have powered the modern AI systems are gradually encountering friction in sustaining continuous exponential growth. This paper views ``the end of AI exponentiation,'' thus exploring how it flutters inside and outside the bubble, where instability emerges within the AI ecosystem through compute and data-center races, speculative investments, and the rat-race toward superintelligence, and outside the ecosystem through labor disruption, governance concerns, public uncertainty, and geopolitical acceleration surrounding future intelligent systems and infrastructures globally.

cs.AI