Better Diameter Bounds for Efficient Shortcuts and a Structural Criterion for Constructiveness

Bernhard Haeupler; Antti Roeyskoe; Zhijun Zhang

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2602.10747

Better Diameter Bounds for Efficient Shortcuts and a Structural Criterion for Constructiveness

Bernhard Haeupler·Antti Roeyskoe·Zhijun Zhang

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

All parallel algorithms for directed reachability and shortest paths crucially rely on efficient shortcut constructions. These constructions find directed paths and shortcut them by adding edges, with the goal to reduce the diameter of the graph. A long sequence of works has studied (efficient) shortcut constructions as well as impossibility results on the best diameter and therefore the best parallelism that can be achieved via this approach. This paper introduces a new conceptual tool for this line of research in the form of a simple and natural structural criterion: A shortcut $H$ for a graph $G$ is certified if for any shortcut edge $(u, v) \in H$, there exists a vertex $w$ such that the edges $(u, w)$ and $(w, v)$ are also in $G \cup H$. We show that this criterion captures constructiveness in the following sense: A shortcut $H$ can be constructed in $t$ time by repeatedly spending $\ell$ time on shortcutting a path of length $\ell$, if and only if, there exists a certified shortcut $H' \supseteq H$ of size $\tilde{O}(t)$. Furthermore, all known shortcut constructions with efficient algorithms can be extended to produce certified shortcuts of size $\tilde{O}(m)$. On the other hand, for shortcut constructions for which attempts to find efficient implementations have failed, we can show that this is impossible. We also obtain stronger diameter lower bounds for certified shortcuts and hopsets. For example, no certified shortcut construction with almost-linear size can reduce a graph's diameter below $n^{1/4-o(1)}$. This seems to be the best bound one can hope for with current techniques.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Bernhard Haeupler, Antti Roeyskoe, Zhijun Zhang. 2026-02-11. Better Diameter Bounds for Efficient Shortcuts and a Structural Criterion for Constructiveness. https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.10747

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

A deterministic $(1+\varepsilon)^n$ approximation for the permanent of a nonnegative matrix

For every fixed $0<\varepsilon\le1$, we give a deterministic strongly polynomial algorithm that, given a nonnegative matrix $A\in\mathbb{R}_{\ge0}^{n\times n}$, returns $Q$ satisfying $\operatorname{per} A\le Q\le(1+\varepsilon)^n\operatorname{per} A$.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗