Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2602.14120

Evaluating the Performance of Approximation Mechanisms under Budget Constraints

Juan Carlos Carbajal·Ahuva Mualem
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We study revenue maximization in a buyer-seller setting where the seller has a single object and the buyer has both a private valuation and a private budget. Private budgets complicate the classic single-product monopoly problem, making optimal mechanisms difficult to characterize. To address this, we evaluate the robust performance of approximation mechanisms relative to optimal mechanisms using three performance measures: the guaranteed fraction of optimal revenue, the maximal value of relaxation, and a revenue non-monotonicity gap. Our analysis reveals sharp contrasts. For distributions with bounded support, simple mechanisms with polylogarithmic menu size can approximate optimal revenue arbitrarily well, even when valuations and budgets are correlated. By contrast, for distributions with unbounded support, and even for bounded distributions concentrated in the unit square, no simple mechanism -- or any mechanism with a finite or sublinear menu -- can guarantee a positive fraction of optimal revenue. In particular, no finite-menu mechanism guarantees any positive fraction even under independence. We also show unbounded revenue gains from certain relaxations under negative correlation and identify cases of revenue non-monotonicity. Overall, our results show that approximation guarantees with private budgets are fragile, revealing fundamental limits to simplicity and robustness in mechanism design.

Explore related subjects

cs.GT

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Juan Carlos Carbajal, Ahuva Mualem. 2026-02-15. Evaluating the Performance of Approximation Mechanisms under Budget Constraints. https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.14120

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

MMS Allocation for Chores with Online Agent Arrivals

We study the fair allocation of $m$ indivisible chores to $n$ agents with subadditive cost functions arriving online in an arbitrary order. Upon an agent's arrival, we are informed of her cost function and must irrevocably assign her a set of chores. We focus on the Maximin Share (MMS) fairness notion and aim to compute an allocation in which all items are assigned, and no agent incurs a cost more than $\alpha$ times her MMS. Without any prior information about the instance (other than $n$ and $m$), we design an algorithm with a competitive ratio of $O(\min\{n, k\log^{1+\epsilon}k, \log m\})$ for any constant $\epsilon > 0$, where $k$ denotes the number of cost function types. Our bound matches the best known offline approximation guarantees for MMS under subadditive costs and is nearly optimal with respect to all three parameters: we show that even for binary additive cost functions, no online algorithm can achieve a competitive ratio of $o(\min\{n, k\log k, \log m\})$. We then consider the setting in which the $k$ cost function types are known in advance (though the realized types of arriving agents are not). For additive cost functions, we provide an algorithm with a competitive ratio of $O(\min\{\log k, \log(kn)/\log\log(kn)\})$, and show that constant-competitive algorithms do not exist for general $k$, even for the binary additive setting. For binary additive functions when $k \le n$, we propose a $3$-competitive algorithm and establish a lower bound of $2$.

cs.GT↗
arXiv2026

Truncated Noisy Best-Response Algorithms: Toward Game Theoretic Learning with Safety Guarantees

We consider a game theoretic approach to solve multi-agent coordination problems with submodular maximization objectives. It is known for such problems that the Nash equilibria for the corresponding game are always within 50% of the optimal, but that the equilibria which achieve this worst-case bound are not stable. To exploit this instability, we propose a family of algorithms which we call Truncated Noisy Best-Response (TNBR) Algorithms. These algorithms are flexibly characterized by agents asynchronously and stochastically selecting actions from a neighbourhood of their best response payoffs. We compute bounds on the recurrent classes of TNBR algorithms' associated Markov chains. Our bounds fall into two categories: first, "Performance" bounds ensure that TNBR algorithms always have a high-value recurrent state; second, "Safety" bounds ensure that TNBR algorithms never have arbitrarily-bad recurrent states. Furthermore, these two types of bounds are linked by a waterbed-like effect: every game with a poor Safety guarantee necessarily has a favorable Performance guarantee.

cs.GT↗
arXiv2026

Existence of the Core in Approval-Based Committee Elections

We settle the main open question in the theory of approval-based multi-winner elections: we show that there always exists a committee in the core. The core is a stability and group fairness concept. The proof introduces a new voting rule that optimizes an entropy-like objective function over committees and payment systems. All local optima of this objective function lie in the core, which implies that a core committee can be found in polynomial time.

cs.GT↗